Talk:Privacy law

Law High‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Human rights High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Computer Security: Computing High‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer Security, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computer security on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer SecurityWikipedia:WikiProject Computer SecurityTemplate:WikiProject Computer SecurityComputer Security articles

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by WikiProject Computing (assessed as High-importance).

Things you can help WikiProject Computer Security with:

Article alerts will be generated shortly by AAlertBot. Please allow some days for processing. More information...

Review importance and quality of existing articles
Identify categories related to Computer Security
Tag related articles
Identify articles for creation (see also: Article requests)
Identify articles for improvement
Create the Project Navigation Box including lists of adopted articles, requested articles, reviewed articles, etc.
Find editors who have shown interest in this subject and ask them to take a look here.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Information Technology Act, 2000#The Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008|Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008]] The anchor (#The Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Prizmic.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 02:43, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Prizmic. Peer reviewers: Jaysdayy.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 02:43, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Peer reviewers: RayBall, Classybluepower.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 07:13, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Question about international section

I have some information I'd like to add to the international legal standards section, primarily standards from APEC and the OECD. I also want to add more about the EU, Council of Europe, and UN. I am just worried about putting APEC there because, although countries from all over the world are members, it is primarily a regional organization. Then again, so are the EU and UN. Should I just add more info about these intergovernmental organizations under the existing heading, or should I create a new section such as "Privacy laws by intergovernmental organization" or something to that effect? Thank you. --Prizmic (talk) 02:52, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ideas for article update

I have some ideas that might help improve this article. First, I want to reorganize it by regions rather than it just being a long list of countries. Next, I hope to include some information about intergovernmental/international bodies for each region, such as the UN and ASEAN. I also plan on adding more information to Southeast Asian countries, including Singapore and Malaysia. I will be working on this article for the next few months. Thank you. --Prizmic (talk) 16:50, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Here is a preliminary bibliography, with sources I plan on using for my additions. I might not use all of the sources, I just wanted to compile a solid list of 20 sources to get started with. Let me know if you have any suggestions. Bibliography:

Belkhamza, Zakariya. 2017. “The Effect of Privacy Concerns on Smartphone App Purchase in Malaysia: Extending the Theory of Planned Behavior.” International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies 11(5):178-194.

Bhasin, Madan Lal. 2016. “Challenge of guarding online privacy: role of privacy seals, government regulations and technological solutions.” Socio-Economic Problems & the State 15(2):85-104.

Bignami, Francesa. 2011. “Cooperative Legalism and the Non-Americanization of European Regulatory Styles: The Case of Data Privacy.” The American Journal of Comparative Law 59(2):411-461.

Butt, Lesli. 2011. “Can you keep a secret? Pretences of confidentiality in HIV/AIDS counseling and treatment in eastern Indonesia.” Medical Anthropology 30(3):319-338.

Chandran, Ravi. 2000. “Privacy in Employment.” Singapore Journal of Legal Studies 2000(1):263-297.

Chesterman, Simon. 2012. “After Privacy: The Rise of Facebook, the Fall of WikiLeaks, and Singapore’s ‘Personal Data Protection Act 2012.’” Singapore Journal of Legal Studies 391-415.

Chik, Warren B. 2013. “The Singapore Personal Data Protection Act and an assessment of future trends in data privacy reform.” Computer Law & Security Review: The International Journal of Technology Law and Practice 29(5):554-575.

Dove, Edward S. 2015. “Biobanks, Data Sharing, and the Drive for a Global Privacy Governance Framework.” Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 43(4):675-689.

Greenleaf, Graham. 2009. “Five years of the APEC Privacy Framework: Failure or promise?” Computer Law and Security Review: The International Journal of Technology and Practice 25(1):28-43.

Greenleaf, Graham. 2012. “Independence of data privacy authorities (Part 1): International standards.” Computer Law & Security Review 28(1):3-13.

Hew, Khe Foon, and Wing Sum Cheung. 2012. “Use of Facebook: A Case Study of Singapore Students’ Experience.” Asia Pacific Journal of Education 32(2):181-196.

Llanillo, Llewellyn L., and Khersien Y. Bautista. 2017. “Zones of Privacy: How Private?” Defense Counsel Journal 1-27.

Marvin, Lynn M. and Yohance Bowden. 2015. “Conducting U.S. Discovery in Asia: An Overview of E- Discovery and Asian Data Privacy Laws.” Richmond Journal of Law & Technology 21(4):1-55.

Mehta, Michael D. 2002. “Censoring Cyberspace.” Asian Journal of Social Sciences 30(2):319-338.

Mitsilegas, Valsamis. 2016. “Surveillance and Digital Privacy in the Transatlantic “War on Terror”: The Case for a Global Privacy Regime.” Columbia Human Rights Law Review 47(3):1-77.

Peng, Shin-Yi. 2003. “Privacy and the Construction of Legal Meaning in Taiwan.” The International Lawyer 37(4):1037-1054.

Tene, Omer. 2013. “Privacy Law’s Midlife Crisis: A Critical Assessment of the Second Wave of Global Privacy Laws.” Ohio State Law Journal 74(6):1217-1261.

Thomas, Mathews. 2004. “Is Malaysia’s MyKad the ‘one card to rule them all’? The urgent need to develop a proper legal framework for the protection of personal information in Malaysia.” Melbourne University Law Review 1-38.

Ramasoota, Pirongrong and Sopak Panichpapiboon. 2014. “Online Privacy in Thailand: Public and Strategic Awareness.” Journal of Law, Information & Science 23(1):97-136.

Reidenberg, Joel R. 2000. “Resolving Conflicting International Data Privacy Rules in Cyberspace.” Stanford Law Review 52(5):1315-1371.

Thank you. --Prizmic (talk) 01:05, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting. Organization by region would be particularly useful if there tend to be regional practices and distinctions, or where there are regional intergovernmental structures (like the EU) which can impose privacy rules on member nations. bd2412 T 01:54, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Photography in Greece

(deleted; the section has been updated to resolve issues) 192.135.166.125 (talk) 19:02, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Peer review

You did a very good job with your contributions to the Privacy Law Wikipedia article. All the sections you added to the article are thoroughly researched, but most importantly, easy to understand for regular readers without any background in privacy law. I especially appreciate your focuses on privacy law for less discussed nations and organizations. You also provided detail history and background on each nation/organization before talking about the privacy law, which allow readers to better why each nation/organization develop look at privacy law differently. Overall, you did an amazing job improving the Privacy Law Wikipedia article. I do not really see anything major that needs to be corrected or changed. However, I guess if you have time over the summer, maybe you can add more nations or organizations. I am sure Wikipedia readers would really appreciated it. GloriaGu2018 (talk) 06:55, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

International Comparisons

I think the article could benefit a lot from a section comparing the differing views of privacy rights by country, and then write about how those views influence various statutes and court decisions. Lawsuits such as those brought by Princess Caroline of Monaco should be described. CessnaMan1989 (talk) 20:46, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Added to introduction

I added to the introduction that privacy laws vary by country because it introduces the content of the article as comparative.MaryJane404 (talk) 21:01, 12 October 2020 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by MaryJane404 (talk • contribs) 21:20, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi for the added contents in the China session, the citation used the article named Privacy(taiwan) and translated it into English. Jojo11234 (talk) 02:37, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Overlap with Information Privacy Law

There are two overlapping articles, Privacy law and Information privacy law. Neither is fully up-to-date, each have their strengths and weaknesses:

Privacy law has barely been updated since December 2020[1]. For example, the United States section doesn't capture the many state statutes that have been passed in the last decade. On the other hand this one captures some of the international structures and may be better written.
Information privacy law is not as well structured as this one, but has been updated. It's got a huge U.S. section (a bit more up to date) but a threadbare international section which isn't comprehensive or up to date.

In my opinion, these articles should be merged. It may be appropriate for editors to try to harmonize the two and then bring an AfD to merge one or the other. Is there a preference of one article name over the other? Oblivy (talk) 02:02, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Social Informatics - ITI 200 Section 91

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 18 January 2024 and 29 April 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Hi.Sanjana, Prismarose, OmarSubhai (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Hi.Sanjana.

— Assignment last updated by Dhara447 (talk) 14:37, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Social Informatics - ITI 200 Section 90

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 17 January 2024 and 29 April 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Allbertkim, Travism121212, Rutgerskyle12, Kkh50 (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Rutgerskyle12 (talk) 00:11, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Change of title

@Allbertkim, could you please explain what "Group D" means in the title of this page? Why did it need to be changed from just "Privacy law"? GraziePrego (talk) 04:58, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Move reverted. This title is inconsistent with our titling scheme for general law-related articles. BD2412 T 16:47, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]