Talk:Procedural programming
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Procedural programming article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 365 days ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Comparison with object-oriented programming
[edit]I would like to see less of the editorial slant in favor of OOP in that topic. For example, instead of using phrases like "it's undeniable that OOP is better at" please use phrases like "Many people believe that OOP is better at".
Also, I would like to see some more information about how procedural programming can be superior to OOP.
Start a discussion about improving the Procedural programming page
Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Wikipedia the best that it can be. You can use this page to start a discussion with others about how to improve the "Procedural programming" page.
Categories:
- Start-Class Computing articles
- Mid-importance Computing articles
- Start-Class software articles
- Mid-importance software articles
- Start-Class software articles of Mid-importance
- All Software articles
- Start-Class Computer science articles
- Mid-importance Computer science articles
- Start-Class Early computers articles
- Mid-importance Early computers articles
- Start-Class Early computers articles of Mid-importance
- All Computing articles
- WikiProject Computer science articles