Talk:Pulmonaria officinalis
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: |
||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Note on Distribution section. The article currently claims "This native species is perhaps the most widespread plant in Europe." This strange claim should be removed, it is too ambiguous but on almost any interpretation is clearly untrue. It also claims that the plant grows in central Sweden. This looks like a confusion with P. obscura, which is indeed quite common in central Sweden. P. officinalis is very rare and occurs only in the extreme south of Sweden, mostly in Skåne. Check Den virtuella floran (http://linnaeus.nrm.se/flora/) for distribution maps of both species. 15:30, 5 March 2014 (UTC)Michaelpeverett (talk)
External links modified[edit]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Pulmonaria officinalis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20050907115044/http://www.rhs.org.uk:80/gardens/wisley/archive/wisleypom04apr.asp to http://www.rhs.org.uk/gardens/wisley/archive/wisleypom04apr.asp
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 05:14, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
Uncited claim to help chest and respiratory maladies[edit]
Please provide citation or remove section saying that this species can treat chest or lung maladies. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.191.93.85 (talk) 06:23, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
- Given that it is called lungwort and the idea that it is good for the lungs is traditional, surely some reference to this, if only to refute it, should be made. 2A00:23C5:30A:9C01:D484:232F:92AB:1B91 (talk) 13:22, 4 April 2023 (UTC)