Talk:Q-Telecom

	Telecommunication portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Telecommunications, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Telecommunications on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TelecommunicationsWikipedia:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTemplate:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTelecommunications articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Greece

	Greece portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greece on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GreeceWikipedia:WikiProject GreeceTemplate:WikiProject GreeceGreek articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Guild of Copy Editors

This article was copy edited by a member of the Guild of Copy Editors.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors articles

Untitled

This is not exactly an objective article on Q-Telecom, is it? Does the author have shares? or work for them? Dutchdavey 14:40, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think too that this is some sort of promotion--GrWikiMan 20:33, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tags stay come and talk if you think you are right.--GrWikiMan 11:08, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As the original creator of this site I have to say that I just copied information from their web site as it was more convenient to create the article. It is better than having no article at all. I agree that it reads like an ad, but most of the information is old anyway and it must be updated to reveal the current situation, after acquistition by TIM GR. If you feel it reads like an ad, just rewrite it and leave out the stupid tags!

Your contribution is welcome, but objectivity is the first priority here. So Tags stay until someone (no matter who) gives us a better version. (Also have in mind that tags are used for categorization, therefore they are necessary).--GrWikiMan 05:41, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Made changes to the article, and I think I can now remove the tags. Put them back if you are not satisfied. Argymeg 14:58, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

copyediting

Ok, I started to work on this article but I need to step away for a few hours. I'll try to get back here soon and finish off what I can. :) Amers4 05:26, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Phew. Ok, there is still a lot of work needed here. Much of this article still reads like an ad. I'm just not bold enough to take out some of it. Someone else? If not, I'll try looking at it tomorrow with fresh eyes. ;) Amers4 07:30, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I hatchetized the article heavily, restructured, and focused on the pieces that still seem to exist. Needs sources.sinneed (talk) 17:25, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have done what I can. I am leaving the copyedit flag in. An interested editor may eventually remove it if they agree it is no longer needed. sinneed (talk) 20:36, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Qtlogo.jpg

Image:Qtlogo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:48, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

question

Is Q-Telecom a MVNO, or just a brand owned by WIND? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_mobile_network_operators_of_Europe#Greece has them as a MVNO, but the Q-Telecom entry does not mention it.Dublinblue (Simon in Dublin) (talk) 14:55, 21 November 2008 (UTC) ΏΓΔγΗὈὄᾏἅmmomjjiij;looskfosdfkdsfa nfhaushhkaahdsjasdjjdkjkfgj kskjgjfiogktmtvm itjvjsjoijttvsijsvgg[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Q-Telecom. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20100417161310/http://www.myq.gr:80/ to http://myq.gr

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:14, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]