Talk:Quarter marks

My Little Pony[edit]

Would it be appropriate to add a sentence or two about 'cutie marks' in My Little Pony? This is where most people (not in the business of owning horses) would know of quarter marks. ~九尾の氷狐~ ^{(「Sumimasen!」「Dochira samaka?」)} 06:10, 21 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

My initial reaction is "OMG NOOOOOOOO!" (grin) But maybe it could go into the My Little Pony article with a wikilink to this one. (In general, once the links to toys and video games start, they become endless....) Montanabw^(talk) 07:42, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

My initial reaction was, "HAH!" But since I wanted to create a See also section so I could add quarter horse, I also added a link to the My Little Pony franchise article with a brief explanation. Since "cutie mark" wasn't used till FIM and there was no section focusing on the symbols alone, I didn't use that phrase. I don't think it belongs in the main body of the article, though. Thanks, --Geekdiva (talk) 19:49, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Neither one belongs. Quarter marks predate both. I tossed the whole see also. Montanabw^(talk) 06:29, 20 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Quarter marks. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:47, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]