Jump to content

Talk:Quasi-constitutionality

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

A few things that I think need to be added to this article:

1. Additional laws that are quasi-constitutional (eg. I've just heard that the Privacy Act is also quasi-constitutional)---"The Privacy Act is a quasi-constitutional document. In other words, it prevails over any other statute unless there are express provisions provided for by Parliament in the legislation that set aside the Privacy Act." (Source: Testimony of Diane Labelle to the House of Commons Standing C'tee on Health, Oct. 19, 2010 at 12:20 pm.)

2. The concept of a "statutory bill of rights" exists in a number of other jurisdictions. Some kind of reference to this parallel ought to be made, to show this isn't uniquely Canadian. Similarly, Canada is only one of a number of jurisdictions with an Interpretation Act.

3. There should be some kind of history of the use of the term "quasi-constitutional" in Canada, since it is this terminology, rather than the actual concept of such a law, that seems to be uniquely Canadian.

4. The degree to which the courts actually defer to quasi-constitutional laws in their decisions is of key importance. Between 1960, when Canada's Bill of Rights was enacted, and 1982, when the Charter of Rights came into effect, the courts normally ignored the override provision of the Bill of Rights, and found every limitation of individual rights contained in later laws to be permissible. The degree to which this deference exists should be discussed: (a) In Canada, vis-a-vis the various quasi-constitutional laws passed over the years in the federal parliament & provincial legislatures; and (b) In other jurisdictions. (For example, to what degree has New Zealand's legislated Bill of Rights proved to be de facto binding?)

Flint and Fire (talk) 13:40, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Quasi-constitutionality. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:12, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Quasi-constitutionality&oldid=1204972200"