This article needs an image (preferably free) related to the subject, such as a picture of the set or a film poster. Please ensure that non-free content guidelines are properly observed.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly articles
This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
FYI, an editor changed the written information to a template and combined the positives and negatives into a single paragraph, ignoring MOS:VAR and not following WP:BRD correctly. In their edit summary, they simply stated "fix", then changed their reasoning to "It is better than to be written manually.", and then to the phrase "the average rating was", which only they found problematic (they've erroneously claimed that this phrase was also objected to in another article, but it is still used). I have opened this discussion in light of this style change and these statements. Since they have not yet provided a valid reason for this style change, let alone a substantial one, perhaps they can share it here. ภץאคгöร22:30, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
