Talk:Quirky (book)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

History of Science Low‑importance

	History of science portal This article is part of the History of Science WikiProject, an attempt to improve and organize the history of science content on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. You can also help with the History of Science Collaboration of the Month.History of ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject History of ScienceTemplate:WikiProject History of Sciencehistory of science articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Requested move 12 October 2018

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Moved (non-admin closure) –Ammarpad (talk) 13:37, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quirky: The remarkable story of the traits, foibles, and genius of breakthrough innovators who changed the world → Quirky (book) – Per WP:CONCISE and WP:SUBTITLE, where the subtitle is too long for a natural disambiguator. A look through reviews of the book show that many sources refer to it as just "Quirky" in their article titles and content, although they may mention the full title + subtitle once at the start. e.g. [1][2][3][4] Bennv3771 (talk) 01:39, 12 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support move per WP:SUBTITLES and WP:CONCISE. Furthermore, very long titles are cumbersome and take up a lot of space in mobile view, as well as in hatnotes, lists, etc. There is absolutely no requirement that an article must be titled the "official" name. For what it's worth, the subtitle should be capitalized as well, because that's how titles are written in American English. --Animalparty! (talk) 07:16, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support per WP:SUBTITLE. I thought Frayae and I had resolved this last month, but it looks like it was reversed on the basis that "WP:SUBTITLE is just a guideline". Sigh. 142.160.89.97 (talk) 07:53, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
support per above and the original title is a long title but must use full discussion, not a speedy move Hhkohh (talk) 10:15, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you're meaning that a full discussion is needed now that the original move had been reversed, certainly. But I hope that's not to suggested that the article should not have been "speedy move[d]" in the first place. Unlike deletion, there is no such thing as a "speedy move". Articles can be moved as needed, provided that they are moved back upon request so that a full discussion can be had. 142.160.89.97 (talk) 22:49, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It means we should not regard as an uncontroversial move Hhkohh (talk) 08:44, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Is that to say it "should not have been 'speedy move[d]' in the first place"? 142.160.89.97 (talk) 18:40, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.