Talk:RMS Leinster

Ships C‑class

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles
C	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.

Shipwrecks

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Shipwrecks, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of shipwreck-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ShipwrecksWikipedia:WikiProject ShipwrecksTemplate:WikiProject ShipwrecksShipwreck articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Shipwreck-related priority open tasks:

To Do

Lady Elizabeth (1879)
- Clean up typos Currently working on it-----Completed!
- Improve grammar
- Add any additions if needed Still adding more information
- Discuss desired additions -None

Irish Maritime

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Irish Maritime, a collaborative effort to improve and standardise the content and structure of maritime, seafaring and inland waterways articles associated with the island of Ireland. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Irish MaritimeWikipedia:WikiProject Irish MaritimeTemplate:WikiProject Irish MaritimeIrish Maritime articles

Ireland Low‑importance

	Ireland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

2005 posts

Regarding the ship's name LE Muirchu, the 'LE' in the ship's title is akin to 'HMS' or 'SS' in English. It is an abbreviation for the Irish words 'Long Eireannach' meaning 'Irish Ship' or 'Ship of Ireland'. Oz MH 23:39, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you to those who have edited my contributions. I find them very helpful. By inspecting the edits I quickly learn the rules regarding style, composition, etc. Oz MH 23:42, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

the prefix LE was not introduced until after Muirchu's time ClemMcGann (talk) 15:10, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Article contradiction

The article Unterseeboot 123 indicates that the U-boat ran aground on the English Coast and was broken up in 1921. --One Salient Oversight 08:59, 13 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The textbooks referenced all say that the UB123 is presumed to have struch a mine at the western end of the 'great barrage'. An explosion was heard on October 18. These books refer to editing of u-boat records by Admiral Arno Spindeler. ClemMcGann 20:59, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The UB-123 sank the Leinster. The U-123 was a different U-boat ClemMcGann 17:46, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 05:11, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Commemorations

I was of the opinion that one picture of a commemoration ceremony was sufficient. Any thoughts? ClemMcGann (talk) 10:08, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

War Crime

The press at the time seem to have regarded the torpedoing of an already sinking ship as a war crime. Is it?

89.168.93.77 (talk) 10:27, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Only a court decision would have settled this definitively. In discussing Capt. Ramm's decision to fire a third torpedo, Ferguson p35 emphasises the fact that the vessel was armed with a 12-pounder cannon, adding "weather conditions did not help and it could not, therefore, be assumed that their quarry was indeed totally helpless." It is none the less an emotive subject and a terrible tragedy. RashersTierney (talk) 11:13, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sort of a secondary issue, as international law at the time clearly prohibited the sinking of hospital ships and passenger liners.HammerFilmFan (talk) 16:03, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

But it was carrying 500 soldiers, so it wasn't exactly a normal passenger liner (altho this was not said publicly at the time, which is why the death toll was originally 176, and is still being investigated 100 years later). Also pro-German sources tend to claim that the British blockade of supplies of food and medicine going to Germany, which began in 1914, allegedly long before Germany started to use its subs to do the same in 1917, was also contrary to international law (tho, if so, one wonders how the British ever allowed that to get into international law). Presumably then as now everybody interpreted or invented alleged international laws to suit their own purposes. However I'd probably better say no more, per WP:NOTFORUM. Tlhslobus (talk) 13:59, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Can we get this into On This Day in its centenary today?

It would be nice to get this added to On This Day on our front page today, because today is the centenary of the event, the worst ever loss of life on the Irish Sea, when RMS Leinster was torpedoed by a German sub just 32 days before World War One ended. I assume it was also one of the worst sinkings of that world war, tho I'd have to check where it fits on that list. So I've added it to the list of events for this day and left a note on its Talk Page. However I've never dealt with On This Day before (I'm more used to working with In The News), and I assume there are article quality issues to be addressed (before an admin will decide to add it to the front page), which I don't have the knowledge or the time to address myself (always assuming it isn't already too late anyway). So I'm also leaving this message here in case anybody knows what more needs to be done, or is interested in trying to find out (again assuming it isn't already too late). Tlhslobus (talk) 13:06, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]