Talk:Rainivoninahitriniony
Appearance
Rainivoninahitriniony was nominated as a Social sciences and society good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (September 12, 2015). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Rainivoninahitriniony/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Tomandjerry211 (alt) (talk · contribs) 17:01, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
Many issues, some listed below:
- First two sections Unreferenced.
- Last fact needs a citation
- Paragraph in lead should be split
- Instead of mentioning his name in the article, just use "he".
- Add isbns or oclcs to the first two sources.
- More sources?
--Tomandjerry211 (alt) (talk) 17:01, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
- Thanks for reviewing this. I hope to get to these changes today. - Lemurbaby (talk) 10:58, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
- Apologies, real life took over. I've been away from home for a work related training. I should have time for getting these done on Sunday 8/23. Thanks for your patience. - Lemurbaby (talk) 11:08, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
- @Lemurbaby: Are you OK with me failing this for now until you get some time to work on it later? After that you can resubmit it for another review, and I'll come right back and pick it up.--Tomandjerry211 (alt) (talk) 11:10, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
- Tomandjerry211 (alt), Lemurbaby hasn't edited on Wikipedia since the above post from August 22, now three weeks ago. It's probably time for you to fail it; Lemurbaby can always renominate after returning and addressing the issues you raised above. BlueMoonset (talk) 21:18, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
- @Lemurbaby: Are you OK with me failing this for now until you get some time to work on it later? After that you can resubmit it for another review, and I'll come right back and pick it up.--Tomandjerry211 (alt) (talk) 11:10, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
- Apologies, real life took over. I've been away from home for a work related training. I should have time for getting these done on Sunday 8/23. Thanks for your patience. - Lemurbaby (talk) 11:08, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
Categories:
- Former good article nominees
- Start-Class biography articles
- Start-Class biography (military) articles
- Mid-importance biography (military) articles
- Military biography work group articles
- Start-Class biography (politics and government) articles
- Mid-importance biography (politics and government) articles
- Politics and government work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- Start-Class military history articles
- Start-Class African military history articles
- African military history task force articles
- Start-Class Africa articles
- Mid-importance Africa articles
- Start-Class Madagascar articles
- Mid-importance Madagascar articles
- WikiProject Madagascar articles
- WikiProject Africa articles