Talk:Reaction to the 2010 Copiapó mining accident

A fact from Reaction to the 2010 Copiapó mining accident appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 24 October 2010 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that around 2,000 members of the media from around the world traveled to the site of the rescue of the Chilean miners?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2010/October.

Wikipedia

Chile Mid‑importance

	Chile portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chile, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Chile on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChileWikipedia:WikiProject ChileTemplate:WikiProject ChileChile
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Disaster management Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Mining Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mining, a collaborative project to organize and improve articles related to mining and mineral industries. If you would like to participate, you can edit the attached article, or visit the project page, where you can see a list of open tasks, join in the discussion, or join the project.MiningWikipedia:WikiProject MiningTemplate:WikiProject MiningMining
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Occupational Safety and Health Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Occupational Safety and Health, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to occupational safety and health on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Occupational Safety and HealthWikipedia:WikiProject Occupational Safety and HealthTemplate:WikiProject Occupational Safety and HealthOccupational Safety and Health
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Name

This article is about the "reaction to the rescue of the miners trapped in the 2010 Copiapó mining accident". The current name is "Reaction to the 2010 Copiapó mining accident", and if the name were correct it should begin with Piñera's reaction when he was in Ecuador. 190.96.13.68 (talk) 23:20, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Propose rename to 2010 Copiapó mining accident (international response)

The main article, 2010 Copiapó mining accident, is a current Good Article Nominee, Engineering and has recently been tagged as too long. To migrate the main article to Wikipedia:Summary style we need to create several daughter articles. To maintain consistency in the naming of the daughter articles I suggest that the daughter articles be named in the style of 2010 Copiapó mining accident (xxxxx xxxxx). To support that project, I propose that we rename this article to 2010 Copiapó mining accident (international reaction) or similar. Feedback please. --Veriss (talk) 05:06, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

support in a heartbeat think we already have this. but if need be split if further and be WP:Bold, no contents is removed so i doub t the controversyu.

Although the name should be International reactions to the 2010 Copiapó mining accident per precedence.Lihaas (talk) 09:33, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Per suggestions in the main article's talk page, I agree with your rename suggestion Lihaas that if renamed it should be International reactions to the 2010 Copiapó mining accident. Cheers, Veriss (talk) 04:39, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]