Talk:Red Light Green Light (song)

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hip hop, a collaborative effort to build a useful resource for and improve the coverage of hip hop on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Hip hopWikipedia:WikiProject Hip hopTemplate:WikiProject Hip hopHip hop articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Songs

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

Requested move 7 July 2021

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved (closed by non-admin page mover) -- Calidum 05:22, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Red Light Green Light (DaBaby song) → Red Light Green Light (song) – No other song of the same name has an article on Wikipedia. MC-123 (talk) 04:53, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is a contested technical request (permalink). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 23:49, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@MC-123, Happily888, and Lennart97: queried move request Anthony Appleyard (talk) 23:54, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@MC-123: Contesting removal of disambiguator because of usage by Dune Rats and Duke Dumont. Compared to the other songs of the same name, DaBaby's article likely doesn't satisfy becoming the primary topic. Happily888 (talk) 07:57, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Happily888: Per WP:SONGDAB, unless more than one article about songs of the same name exist, there is no need to disambiguate any further. Since the other songs you mention don't have articles, the proposed move is justified. Lennart97 (talk) 12:38, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- @Lennart97: Although I believe that this case could fall under the section's exception for redirects clause because the song results to be the most preferred option for readers's searches and/or it is a highly valued recording by multiple reliable sources. Both the Dune Rats and Duke Dumont songs would have better notability under primary topic guidelines than DaBaby's song currently does. Happily888 (talk) 02:57, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per WP:SONGDAB. As the only notable topic of this name, clear primary. Requiring readers to first navigate to a disambiguation page of topics not notable enough for articles does the opposite of what our disambiguation guidelines are intended to do, which is aid reader navigation.--Yaksar (let's chat) 17:06, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support per my comment above. I see no indication that the other songs with this name are equally or more notable as long as they don't have articles. Lennart97 (talk) 17:20, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support per WP:SONGDAB and Lennart97 and Yaksar's comments. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AshMusique (talk • contribs) 09:54, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support. I would have moved it myself if I'd found it before this RM was made. Ss112 10:15, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support This song is clearly the more notable of the three as the Dune Rats song doesn’t appear to even meet notability criteria since it doesn’t look like it charted or got certified anywhere. The Duke Dumont song barely meets the criteria with a NZ Hot Singles peak and an ARIA gold certification but comparing that to this song reaching the top 50 in two countries it is clear this is the more notable of the two. CAMERAwMUSTACHE (talk) 12:36, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.