Talk:Reel Moments

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Former good article nominee Reel Moments was a Media and drama good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There are suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
Date Process Result
December 3, 2011 Good article nominee Not listed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on September 6, 2011.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Reel Moments is a competition in which Glamour readers submit short stories to be produced as short films by celebrity volunteer female directors?

File:Jessicabielgfdl.jpg Nominated for Deletion[edit]

Image-x-generic.svg An image used in this article, File:Jessicabielgfdl.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests October 2011
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 12:22, 2 October 2011 (UTC)

GA Review[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Reel Moments/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk · contribs) 01:39, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: none found.

Linkrot: one found and tagged.[1] Jezhotwells (talk) 01:45, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

Checking against GA criteria[edit]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    Objectives of the project include empowering women by producing female-friendly short films while creating opportunities for actresses to direct and extending the Glamour brand This is ungrammatical, "while creating opportunities for actresses to direct and extending the Glamour brand" confuses the subjects of the sentence. Please rewrite.
    She also, co-wrote the film. Why the comma?
    was received so well that she parlayed the experience into a directing role poor word choice
    Carol Leifer was the final director of Blinders So who was the first director?
    the films were also produced by a woman from Moxie Pictures in Los Angeles. Who?
    Wilson sings the closing track in her film. change of tense here, be consistent.
    The films were debuted at ?? "debuted at" or "were premiered at"
    Why do we jump from 2008 to 2010? What happened in 2009?
    The films debuted at the Directors Guild Theater on October 25, 2010 with Weisz in absentia "in absentia" Please? Are you tring to impress by using words you don't understand?
    included a cast of Christina Ricci, Daniel Stern, Kathy Najimy and Troy Garity "included a cast of"?
    Other volunteer actors include Justin Long, Aziz Azari, and Jaclyn Jonet. Change of tense
    The shorts, that fall under the year's theme of empowering women to feel beautiful, will open on October 24 at the Director's Guild Theater and be available on glamourreelmoments.com the following day. That was six weeks ago. Did it happen?
    Organization is poor, the article consists mainly of badly written statements thrown together, with no structure or flow. No critical comment, no reception.
    Lead does not summarize the article, see WP:LEAD.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    One dead link as noted above.
    Sources appear reliable, no evidence of OR
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    Organization is poor, the article consists mainly of statements thrown together, lots of trivia, with no structure or flow. No critical comment, no reception.
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
    NPOV
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
    stable
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    A surfeit of images which appear to be eye candy, without adding any extra content.
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    A rough first draft but nowhere near GA standard. Not listed. Jezhotwells (talk) 02:20, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Reel Moments. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

You may set the |checked=, on this template, to true or failed to let other editors know you reviewed the change. If you find any errors, please use the tools below to fix them or call an editor by setting |needhelp= to your help request.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

If you are unable to use these tools, you may set |needhelp=<your help request> on this template to request help from an experienced user. Please include details about your problem, to help other editors.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 02:56, 26 February 2016 (UTC)