Jump to content

Talk:Resolution Guyot

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Featured articleResolution Guyot is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on February 2, 2023.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
October 12, 2019Featured article candidatePromoted

Bathymetric map

[edit]

@Jo-Jo Eumerus: Is there any reason this page doesn't have a figure depicting the bathymetry and shape of Resolution Guyot? I'm not seeing anything about it on the FAC. I can try and make one using GEBCO data and GMT. Balon Greyjoy (talk) 09:33, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

For the standard reason why Wikipedia articles don't have an image: There isn't a non-copyrighted one. If you can create or get a non-copyrighted one that would be great. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:54, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I added these two images; please let me know if you have any feedback.
  • Balon Greyjoy (talk) 12:00, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

    Seems good but I am a little concerned that by using GEBCO data it might be a derivative work of GEBCO; Nikkimaria, what say you? Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 12:06, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    If you're only using data it's fine - data is not typically copyrightable. Nikkimaria (talk) 14:13, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    The gridded bathymetric data is the only thing I got from GEBCO; I wrote the script to generate the plots (and am also a maintainer for PyGMT software). Balon Greyjoy (talk) 14:11, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    Seems like you are fine to add these, then. Balon Greyjoy, if whatever-you-used-to-create-these-images is scalable, there is a lot of other articles that could similary be expanded. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 14:52, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

    @Jo-Jo Eumerus and Vida0007: Would you like any changes or updates to the 3D bathymetric map for this article? I saw that it's nominated over at WP:TFAR and want to let you know that I can change the figure if you think it could be improved (different perspective angle, different region covered in the map, different color scheme). Balon Greyjoy (talk) 13:24, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    I'm okay with the current bathymetric map, but I wouldn't mind to see a different angle to it. Vida0007 (talk) 13:34, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Same for me. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 16:04, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 2 February 2023

    [edit]

    Change "The guyot was probably formed by a" to "The guyot was likely formed by a" Enter Demoman (talk) 21:22, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

     Not done: same meaning. I think the current version is clearer. – small jars tc 15:11, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    ok Enter Demoman (talk) 16:26, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]