Talk:Right by My Side

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Right by My Side article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Songs

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

R&B and Soul Music Low‑importance

	R&B and Soul Music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject R&B and Soul Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of R&B and Soul Music articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.R&B and Soul MusicWikipedia:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicTemplate:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicR&B and Soul Music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women in Music Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

March 2012

It says "It was released as the second single on March 27, 2012." That's in the future. Is that incorrect, or is it not going to be released until then? Comatmebro (talk) 00:13, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article doesn't say anything more than what is on the album article. This doesn't seem necessary at all. Comatmebro (talk) 00:15, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I think the article should be merged because it has minimal content (as of the moment) and can be easily covered in a few sentences on the Pink Friday: Roman Reloaded article. Kinkreet^{~♥moshi moshi♥~} 11:31, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I started the discussion for the merge on that talk page. Comatmebro (talk) 23:22, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

Is twitter allowed to be used as a source here? Comatmebro (talk) 06:24, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but make sure that you put the link as a source! Bleubeatle (talk) 09:22, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I wasn't planning on putting in a source from twitter. I just noticed that there already was one and I wasn't sure if twitter was acceptable as a source for wikipedia articles. Comatmebro (talk) 21:41, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If the statement is to say that XX said YY on Twitter, then Twitter can be source, but that's the only instance I can think of where it is appropriate. Kinkreet^{~♥moshi moshi♥~} 08:31, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Genre

Isn't the song also Pop?The other Wikipedias say that the song is pop.--Nikinikolananov (talk) 09:03, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]