Talk:Rockfield Studios

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Professional sound production, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sound recording and reproduction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Professional sound productionWikipedia:WikiProject Professional sound productionTemplate:WikiProject Professional sound productionProfessional sound production articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Wales Low‑importance

	Wales portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wales, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Wales on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WalesWikipedia:WikiProject WalesTemplate:WikiProject WalesWales articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

MonmouthpediA High‑importance

	This article is related to MonmouthpediA and to Monmouth – the World's first Wikipedia town. As of May 2012, we have 1,000 QRpedia codes displayed in the town. See what we are doing, See a bit of what we've done and help us!MonmouthpediAWikipedia:GLAM/MONTemplate:WikiProject MonmouthpediAMonmouthpediA-related articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Queen[edit]

I've reverted these edits - they may have a source, but they made no sense in context. If there is a disagreement over what Queen did at Rockfield, it can be discussed here and a coherent version of the text can be drafted. Ghmyrtle (talk) 16:20, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Robbie Williams[edit]

This source, [1], used here, says that Williams recorded at Rockfield. But he's not listed in the artist roster. Does anyone have a source for when/what he recorded at Rockfield - assuming the BBC article's accurate? KJP1 (talk) 12:20, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Shading into advertising?[edit]

synthfiend - I have a concern that some of the recent additions are shading into advertising. Do we really need to know the number of bedrooms they have, and that they can provide full-board? Incidentally, this is sourced to a interview with the owner, and I’m not sure how RS this is? I can see how the extensive details of the types of equipment they have will be of interest to readers. KJP1 (talk) 16:53, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the input; I have no issues with toning it down a bit, though I do think it important to include more detail than simply the term "residential," as I don't think many readers know what that means. synthfiend (talk) 17:34, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with KJP1. Wording such as what it "..offers..." looks very promotional to me, and as a general point of principle I think that the history section should precede the section on current facilities, as it was previously. Ghmyrtle (talk) 17:49, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]