Talk:Roe Highway

Australian Roads: Western Australia Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Australian Roads, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to roads and highways in Australian states and territories. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Australian RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject Australian RoadsTemplate:WikiProject Australian RoadsAustralia road transport articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Topics:
/
	Western Australia

This article has a KML file.

Australia: Western Australia / Perth / Transport Low‑importance

	Australia portal Roe Highway is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Western Australia (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Perth (assessed as High-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian Transport (assessed as Mid-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Western Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Copyright infringement

An advertising feature run in The West Australian edition 7 April 2006 used content from this webpage verbatim. After inquiring with the featured organisation (Main Roads Western Australia), The West Australian were confirmed as authors of the advertising feature. A complaint was submitted by me via the e-mail feedback on their website on 17 April 2006. It was as follows:

Dear The West:

I was pleased to see that an advertising feature about the Roe Highway ran in your Metropolitan edition Friday 7 April 2006. The advertising feature used content from Wikipedia (http://www.wikipedia.org/), the free encyclopedia. This is the sort of reuse that those who contribute to Wikipedia, as I do, wish to promote.

However, I’d like to point out that when you use content from Wikipedia you ought to include a link back to the source Wikipedia article as is suggested on Wikipedia’s copyrights page, which is located at http://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Copyrights.

Specifically, the advertising featured used content from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roe_Highway#History. I was a contributor to this article, and text that I wrote appeared verbatim in the advertising feature. Since it appears without attribution to me, or a link to the Wikipedia history, or the text of the GFDL under which I released my contributions, the existence of this page violates my copyright, as well as those of all other contributors.

Please in the future provides acknowledgments to all parts of articles/advertising features authored by your publication that use Wikipedia content verbatim. Thank you.

Sincerely, Ian Peters Ian peters 15:26, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is rather interesting, even a little amusing I must say. They could have at least linked back or even cited there sources. - Boochan 06:00, 21 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Very observant Ian and well handled. Perhaps it would be worthwhile to mention this on the Australian Wikipedians' notice board. Nachoman-au 10:08, 21 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a copy of the West Australian's story anywhere?? pfctdayelise (translate?) 02:15, 22 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The West Australians site is just a plug for its online edition. If I knew earlier I probably could have gotten the article, but I'm guessing papers backdated that old have being thrown out now (I have The West on home delivery)... - Boochan 13:33, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Incidentally the "Eastern Reporter" and "Southern Gazette", in the page 6 article "Link to Perth" in the ill-famed August liftout (which made it onto Media Watch in early October) sampled large sections of the History section, including the 2nd and 5th paragraphs verbatim. Seems this article is well-read amongst Perth media types... Orderinchaos 17:42, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

124.178.14.173

124.178.14.173 was me. Forgot to log in--M W Johnson 09:32, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Stage 8 (Fremantle Eastern Bypass)

It looks to me like it is going to be built (or at least re-planned) anyway. Should this go in the article? [1] —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.171.154.129 (talk) 08:23, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Future upgrades

I think details of the upgrading of the intersection at Roe and Great eastern highway, to a flyover style intersection should be added, also notes made about how it is planned to become a Ring road for Perth in the future, and even talk of becoming freeway standard. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Possessedbeaver (talk • contribs) 13:35, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Roe Highway. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20050308083017/http://www.roe7.com.au:80/ to http://www.roe7.com.au

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 10:26, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]