Talk:Roman Catholic Diocese of Plymouth

Christianity: Catholicism Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Catholic Church portal This article is supported by WikiProject Catholicism (assessed as Low-importance).

Devon Low‑importance

	Devon portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Devon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Devon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DevonWikipedia:WikiProject DevonTemplate:WikiProject DevonDevon articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cornwall Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cornwall, an attempt to improve and expand Wikipedia coverage of Cornwall and all things Cornish. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project member page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.CornwallWikipedia:WikiProject CornwallTemplate:WikiProject CornwallCornwall-related articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

See drop-down box for suggested article edit guidelines:

Be bold - if you know something about Cornwall then put it in! We value your contributions and don't be afraid if your spelling isn't great as there are plenty of spelling and grammar experts on clean-up duty!
Articles on settlements in Cornwall should be written using the standard set of headings approved by the UK geography WikiProject's guideline How to write about settlements.
At WikiProject Cornwall we subscribe to the policies laid down by Wikipedia - particularly civility and consensus building. We are aware that the wording on Cornish entries can sometimes be a contentious topic, especially those concerning geography. You don't have to agree with everything but there is no excuse for rudeness and these things are best solved through consensus building and compromise. For more information see WP:CornwallGuideline.
These pages are not platforms for political discussion. Issues relating to Cornish politics should be restricted to those pages that directly deal with these issues (such as Constitutional status of Cornwall, Cornish nationalism, etc) and should not overflow into other articles.
Most of all have fun editing - that's the reason we all do this, right?!

Child protection official has been caught with 4,000 pictures of child porn

"A child protection official for the Catholic Church has been caught with 4,000 pictures of child porn. ... Married Jarvis, 49, a former social worker, was employed by the church following sex scandals about pervert priests. His job was to monitor church groups to ensure paedophiles did not gain access to children in the church’s congregations. ...He admitted 12 counts of making, possessing and distributing indecent images...Jarvis, who has been sacked from his job as child safeguarding officer, worked the Diocese of Plymouth for nine years."

Church child protection chief caught with 4,000 child porn pictures mirror.co.uk.--91.39.113.246 (talk) 21:06, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Roman Catholic Diocese of Plymouth. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070905160556/http://www.plymouthcathedral.org.uk/ to http://www.plymouthcathedral.org.uk/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:55, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Did not take effect?"

@Dcheney: We would like to know what it signifies when your database indicates "Did not take effect", in this case the coadjutor "Father James Moor". From the heading, we would infer that he was not ordained a bishop and possibly died before the ceremony. It could also mean that he was installed as coadjutor but never succeeded the ordinary. Could you clarify for us? Does it mean the same thing everywhere it is noted? Elizium23 (talk) 18:04, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

In this case, according to Annuaire Pontifical Catholique, 1916, p391: "refuse et non sacre" (refused and not consecrated). If it applies to "selected" then it normally means Papal confirmation was denied. It is also used in cases where an appointment is made after the candidate's death (before the news of the death has reached Rome). Dcheney (talk) 20:37, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NOT a directory

@Mark J: According to consensus, Wikipedia is not a directory applies to exhaustive lists of parishes and schools within the diocesan articles. If you wish to create a well-sourced standalone article of a notable topic such as the schools in a given diocese, we would not object to its existence. But because of the non-notability of the vast majority of parishes such as you have added to this article, exhaustive lists are not suitable and WP:UNDUE for inclusion in this type of article. Elizium23 (talk) 20:39, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough. I won't go around taking down lists elsewhere (I think somewhere between 1/3 and 1/2 of Church of England diocese articles have a church list, also many counties and London boroughs), but I won't object if you decide to. Mark J (talk) 21:17, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mark J, I only work in Roman Catholic topics, and this is, for the time being, more or less a local consensus. So while I weakly disagree, I won't impinge on the decisions of these other editors to list parishes. Thanks for letting me know. Elizium23 (talk) 21:27, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No worries - useful to know the consensus at least in the R. C. world. Thanks. Mark J (talk) 21:48, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]