Talk:Rosalind Runcie

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical music, which aims to improve, expand, copy edit, and maintain all articles related to classical music, that are not covered by other classical music related projects. Please read the guidelines for writing and maintaining articles. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Classical musicWikipedia:WikiProject Classical musicTemplate:WikiProject Classical musicClassical music articles

Biography: Musicians / Peerage and Baronetage

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Peerage and Baronetage.

Women in Music Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Is she still alive?

I find it odd that the article talks about Lady Runcie as if she is no longer with us, but gives no dates. It seems a little unkind - surely the assumption should be that she is still around, if data is not available? 138.37.199.199 18:31, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Excessive detail

I removed details about her children's marriages. Wikipeia is not Burke's Peerage. The family details were formerly placed too early in the article, no doubt someone will add an infox in due course for those who find it of the greatest importance. Philip Cross (talk) 09:30, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]