This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hinduism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hinduism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
I really would appreciate someone sourcing this before they put it up. Not saying its not true, but its also quite unreasonable to make that statement without some reliable reference. --Gñāna (talk) 21:34, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
If anyone can get access to any of the following works, the article may benefit from including any pertinent information they may contain. I'd be very interested to view their bibliographies.
Ramakrishna, G. & Rao, R. S. (1965). "Origin and Growth of the Concept of rta in Vedic Literature". Doctoral Dissertation. online
Heckaman, Curtis R. (1979). "Toward a Comprehensive Understanding of Rta in the Rig Veda" in: ETD Collection for McMaster University, Paper AAIMK50829.
Premnath, D. N. (1994). "The Concepts of Rta and Maat: A Study in Comparison" in: Biblical Interpretation: A Journal of Contemporary Approaches, Volume 2, Number 3, pp. 325-339.
DeVries, L. (1979). "Vedic rta- and Avestan aša", Doctoral Dissertation, University of Minnesota.
Chakrabarti, Samiran C. (2006). "Rta, Satya, Tattva, Tathya" in: Sen, Pranab K. (Ed.) Philosophical Concepts Relevant to Sciences in Indian Tradition (Series: History of Science, Philosophy and Culture in Indian Civilization, Vol. 3, Part 4.) Delhi: Centre for Studies in Civilizations. ISBN: 8-187-58627-3.
Davis, D. A. (1998). "The Presence of Rta" in: Sharma, B. D. & Ghose, N. (Eds.) Revisiting Indus-Sarasvati Age and Ancient India.
Khanna, Madhu (2004). Rta: The Cosmic Order. New Delhi. ISBN: 8-124-60252-2.
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the proposal was moved. --BDD (talk) 21:21, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
The current title, "Rta", is spelled incorrectly, as it omits the diacritical "Ṛ" that is included in the correct title of the concept. In addition, the diacritical title is used throughout the article itself, as well as among many related articles, and therefore its current spelling is not only incorrect, but it is also likely to cause confusion about why the article's title is spelled differently from the word ubiquitously spelled correctly as Ṛta. — J~Pæst 04:17, 2 June 2013 (UTC) 04:17, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
I wonder if English language reliable sources use the standard Latin R. RedSlash 04:40, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Comment - Klaus K. KLostermaier A survey of Hinduism 1989 p130 "The hymns speak of ṛta, "the law, "as independent of the devas, standing apart and above them as an impersonal and infallibly ... The word ṛta is connected with ṛtu, the seasons, the regular round of spring, summer, rain, autumn, and winter." etc show that high quality sources which can use Ṛ sometimes do, but would like to see eg. WP:SANSKRIT for more information on WikiProject Hinduism's consensus MOS. In ictu oculi (talk) 23:41, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Support. Articles, their titles and spelling should be relevant to the people that the topic is relevant to. This is how to engage lcoal editors or editors with specific interests. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 05:49, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.