This article was nominated for deletion on 5 October 2013. The result of the discussion was keep.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
Rudik Hyusnunts is within the scope of WikiProject Artsakh, an attempt to improve and better organize information in articles related or pertaining to Artsakh and Artsakhians. If you would like to contribute or collaborate, you could edit the article attached to this page or visit the project page for further information.ArtsakhWikipedia:WikiProject ArtsakhTemplate:WikiProject ArtsakhArtsakh articles
I trimmed a bunch of unreferenced assertions. They may be true, but, in my opinion, a shorter article that is completely referenced is better than a longer article with a long unreferenced section.
I didn't remove the material. I commented it out. So, if whoever originally inserted it, can reference it, they can remove the comment tags as soon as they reference it.
At {{afd}} the concern was expressed that the early material looked like it might have been cut and paste from some kind of official site -- which makes cutting and pasting look like a copyright violation. Of course unrecognized states can't be signatories to international copyright agreements, so cutting and pasting may very well be perfectly legal. Nevertheless, if this material was cut and paste it should be rewritten. It should probably be rewritten anyhow, as it gives the appearance of being drafted by a non-English speaker. Geo Swan (talk) 18:47, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]