Talk:SIAI-Marchetti SF.260

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the SIAI-Marchetti SF.260 article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Aviation: Aircraft

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

This article is supported by the aircraft project.

Military history: Aviation / European / Italian

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	European military history task force
	Italian military history task force (c. 500–present)

Merge F-260 with SF-260

I propose moving this page to SF-260. Only the two prototypes were known as F-260s, all the others are "SF", which makes it the common name per WP naming conventions. Akradecki 18:29, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fonske (talk) 22:14, 9 January 2012 (UTC) ICAO whise, we do still use the abbreviation F-260 in stead.[reply]

Philippine Air Force project "Layang"

I removed the "SF.260WP Warrior - Layang" from the list of variants. The user who added that may have been a bit confused as the upgrade project initially dealt with conversion of remaining SF.260MP/WP to SF.260TP, but later involved conversion of SF.260TP to attack aircraft by fitting hard points and gun sights.[1] I'm not sure how or if this should be added to the list of variants though, so I leave that to those of you with more information on the SF-260. --Edward Sandstig (talk) 17:44, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That tank-crushed 'plane

I don't think the photograph and video of the tank sitting on top of an unfortunate aircraft depict a Libyan Air Force example as claimed. Note the paint scheme, the lack of roundels, and the civil registration visible on the fuselage. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 01:50, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on SIAI-Marchetti SF.260. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:24, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]