Talk:SNADS
Appearance
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
Comments
[edit]This seems wrong to me. The redirect page should be removed and this page moved to SNADS. Acronyms and initialisms are almost always presented in all capitals.
People will also often say this isn't an acronym but an initialism.
Requested move
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: moved. Jenks24 (talk) 11:21, 5 August 2012 (UTC)
Snads → SNADS – I agree with the above. IBM uses all caps, as in [1]. SNADS is currently a redirect to Snads that has to be deleted to do the move. Peter Flass (talk) 00:38, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
- Support. Nearly all the reliable sources on the subject use SNADS. The article should be moved per WP:COMMONNAME.--SGCM (talk) 23:10, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
- Support. As stated above it's what IBM and most reliable sources use.--Southronite (talk) 03:41, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
- Support the only potential issue the WP:MOSTM does not apply since this is an acronym.--70.49.81.140 (talk) 03:24, 25 July 2012 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Categories:
- Stub-Class Computing articles
- Unknown-importance Computing articles
- Stub-Class Computer networking articles
- Unknown-importance Computer networking articles
- Stub-Class Computer networking articles of Unknown-importance
- All Computer networking articles
- Automatically assessed Computing articles
- All Computing articles