Talk:SNR-300

Germany Mid‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Energy

	Energy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

All information gleaned from the german page. My limited skills at german didn't help. Rzwitserloot 14:51, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Kernwasser Wunderland

"Kernwasser Wunderland" ("Nuclearwater wonderland") sounds like a spoof, but after a bit of Googling, all the refs I've found seem to confirm that it is real. In particular, this satellite image appears to show just what the article describes: a power station site transformed into an amusement park, complete with the illustrated concrete tower shown in the depictions of the "Kernwasser Wunderland". The mind boggles. -- The Anome 12:57, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

it is real. The sad thing is they renamed it into "Kalkar wonderland". --Weltweltwelt 06:29, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

public unrest

I don't doubt the increasing public unrest over the facility, but some additional citations in the timeline would really help to support the article. I added citation marks in a couple of spots accordingly. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 161.165.196.84 (talk) 00:18, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

language

I strongly invite a bit of improvement by a native english speaking person here. IMO it is needed on some key terms. --Ruckgerm (talk) 22:15, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]