Talk:Plukenetia volubilis

This article was nominated for deletion on 30 January 2008. The result of the discussion was Withdrawn.

Things to do

Things to do

Check spelling of: semileñosa & ~~euphorbiaceous.~~
~~Add userbox, incorporating Latin botanical name information at bottom of page.~~
Research if used in diets because of its high nutritional value. (cultivated) sure to be.

Appears to be marketed as a "super food on the internets. make sure to write something about that.

Find a picture (MOAR PIX PLS!!$#%#$%).

(get help on this, luddite me knows nothign about the pix or copyright or anything).

-Picture added as of 23 Oct, I took this in Ecuador. The lifted lorax (talk) 00:35, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

~~Add links to other wikipedias (if any).~~ bots do this yeah?

I'm too busy to do all this at the moment (at work) but i'll be back later to help out. -- Ļıßζېấשּׂ~ۘ Ώƒ ﻚĢęخ (talk) 22:54, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

(Semilenosa is like tomentose but not as hairy, it is spanish for slighty hairy leaves) —Preceding [[Djc266 (talk) 15:39, 31 January 2008 (UTC)Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by 07:37, January 31, 2008 (talk) [reply]

References

I can't seem to get the text to highlight, so it links out to other sites. Others have criticized the legitimacy of Sacha Inchi and by providing external references, readers can verify the legitimacy themselves.Djc266 (talk) 15:40, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Common name versus scientific name

Can Sacha Inchi be included in the main title for the page, not many people know what sacha inchi is and even fewer know the scientific name. Could it be included in parentheses?Djc266 (talk) 16:29, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's a redir, which means that even if you search for "sacha inchi", you'll be directed here. Pretty much serves the same purpose. Yng varr 17:24, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank youDjc266 (talk) 19:41, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Food and drink Tagging

This article talk page was automatically added with {{WikiProject Food and drink}} banner as it falls under Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . Maximum and carefull attention was done to avoid any wrongly tagging any categories , but mistakes may happen... If you have concerns , please inform on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot (talk) 18:04, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please clarify

In the line "Its oil is one of the largest plant sources of the Omega family of fatty acids, an essential for human life. It contains Omega 3 (48%), Omega 6 (36%), Omega 9 (9%), and protein (27%)." the "and protein (27%)" needs to be taken out, as the "It" refers to the oil, adding up all the percentages we see that they are well over 100%, aside from that the mentioning of the protein is redundant. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fmoreira (talk • contribs) 17:23, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

At the end of first ¶: "It grows better in acidic soils, frank and alluvial flats near rivers."

Please define the word "frank". Even better if it could be hot-linked the way "alluvial" is. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.49.232.222 (talk) 20:16, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]