This article is within the scope of WikiProject Literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LiteratureWikipedia:WikiProject LiteratureTemplate:WikiProject LiteratureLiterature articles
Religious views of Samuel Johnson is part of WikiProject Anglicanism, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to Anglicanism and the Anglican Communion. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AnglicanismWikipedia:WikiProject AnglicanismTemplate:WikiProject AnglicanismAnglicanism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles
A fact from Religious views of Samuel Johnson appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 10 September 2008, and was viewed approximately 131 times (disclaimer) (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
We need to talk about the name of this page. DGG mentioned ethical views. I don't care any way really. Ottava Rima (talk) 02:36, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
the actual content at the moment is about ethics, not religion. None of the actual examples given even mention religion., and that is because SJ tended not to mention religion explicitly in a non-religious context. My personal impression about why he spoke & wrote that way is that he considered it too serious (in the 18th century sense) a subject to use in an argument when not specifically called for. I would rather work on this than on what I'm currently doing, but I feel an obligation to do the rescues. DGG ( talk ) 01:19, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I can't agree with your statement that the article's "actual content at the moment is about ethics, not religion." As far as I can see, the article is about his religious views from beginning to end. The assertion that "none of the actual examples given even mention religion" is certainly not correct. Here are just a few examples from the article as it currently stands:
Johnson was also religious and believed in High Church Anglicanism.
This is not to say that Johnson was passive in his religious beliefs; instead, he was an 18th century evangelical, which, as he defines in his Dictionary, means "Agreeable to gospel; consonant to the Christian law contained in the holy gospel".
Christian religion and ethics are the primary topic of the sermons with emphasis on marriage, repentance, hardening the heart, charity, pride, wisdom, and compassion.
I believe the current title, Samuel Johnson's religious views, is the most appropriate one for an article discussing the moral/ethical/religious content of his writings, particularly because the basis for all of his moralistic writings and sermons was his own religious conviction. Neelix (talk) 19:22, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
