Talk:Samuel More

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the military biography work group (assessed as Low-importance).

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Biography / British / European / Early Modern / Wars of the Three Kingdoms

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military biography task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	Early Modern warfare task force (c. 1500 – c. 1800)
	Wars of the Three Kingdoms task force

Archives

1

Re-write

So-called re-write produced ambiguity and some factual errors. The biographer of the book himself was pleased with the original article (See Talk:Richard More (Mayflower passenger). It is a complicated story and should not be "gutted". Mugginsx (talk) 12:05, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I stumbled upon this intriguing account of a tragic historical event, and agree with Mugginex that it deserves better treatment. Some sections contain grammatical errors as well as glaring ambiguities, rendering them practically incomprehensible. I hope that someone with the requisite knowledge of the topic will restore order to this confusing, albeit fact-laden article.108.7.254.132 (talk) 04:07, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]