Talk:San Cibrao

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Weird linking[edit]

The article links la Mariña Lucense to Mondoñedo. The linked article does not mention Mariña Lucense. What is the relationship between the two? - Jmabel | Talk 17:16, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cervo[edit]

The relationship to Cervo, Lugo (an article we apparently lack so far) is confusing. The article says San Cibrao is "part of Cervo (which is both a settlement and municipality of the Lugo Province)." Then it refers to "The Royal Factory of Sargadelos in Cervo outskirts San Cibrao]]" and "The Royal Factory of Sargadelos in Cervo outskirts of San Cibrao" both of which are ungrammatical. So is San Cibrao in Cervo, is Cervo on the outskirts of San Cibrao, or what? - Jmabel | Talk 00:43, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The change of "outskirts" to "nearby" doesn't clarify much, since it still doesn't parse. Does this mean "near San Cibrao" (near but not in)? "on the outskirts of San Cibrao" (on the edge, hard to define if it is in or out? "in nearby San Cibrao" (in San Cibrao, which, in turn, is near, but not in, Cervo)? - Jmabel | Talk 19:49, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on San Cibrao. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:24, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]