Talk:Science Channel

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Science Channel article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: Index, 1: 365 days

Television: Stations Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Television stations task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Archives (index)

Index 1

This page has archives. Sections older than 365 days may be automatically archived by when more than 4 sections are present.

The Survivorman Channel

It's a good show but it makes the Science Channel look like it can't fulfill it's mission. Is the Science Channel now the Survivorman Channel? Should we change the article title?

Or should the programming just be considered an example of strange things that people will do when engaged in organizational behavior (not the Survivorman himself, but the Science Channel executives who somehow convinced themselves in committee that it wasn't absurd to fill a Science channel with survival shows, Ufology shows, shows about factory line production and construction projects).

Hey to be fair, at certain points during the week the channel actually has some Science!

2602:306:BDA0:97A0:466D:57FF:FE90:AC45 (talk) 23:19, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 15 July 2018

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 02:24, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Science (TV network) → Science Channel – This is till the full official name, so "(TV network)" is a needless disambiguator. jamacfarlane (talk) 15:47, 15 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support as a WP:NATURALDISAMBIG as it is the official name and I think it's probably also the WP:COMMONNAME too, as that is usually how people refer to it. "Science" is just a branding thing. Rreagan007 (talk) 20:49, 15 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support as per Rreagan007. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 01:36, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support per NATURAL DISAMBIGUATION policies (e.g., American Broadcasting Company instead of ABC (TV network)). CookieMonster755 ✉ 03:38, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The UFOlogy programs

also should be in the list of scifi programs they carry...? ELSchissel (talk) 14:10, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]