Talk:Second Great Depression

This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.DisambiguationWikipedia:WikiProject DisambiguationTemplate:WikiProject DisambiguationDisambiguation articles

Requested move 24 January 2019

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved -- JHunterJ (talk) 14:52, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Second Great Depression → Second Great Depression – Definite article unnecessary. jareha ^(comments) 21:34, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is a contested technical request (permalink). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 05:46, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Jareha and MarkZusab: queried move request Anthony Appleyard (talk) 05:47, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm contesting this request because all entries on the disambiguation that are exact matches are titled "The Second Great Depression". Nothing on that page is just called "Second Great Depression". Also see The Great Depression (disambiguation). However, I do think that creating a redirect from Second Great Depression to The Second Great Depression would be a good idea. MarkZusab (talk) 23:17, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Add the suffix “(disambiguation)”. It is unfriendly to readers to have this title, looking like an article that one should know about, but not. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 22:07, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Per WP:DABNAME, that should not be done. MarkZusab (talk) 22:13, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  - Repudiate DABNAME as a pretty stupid old convention, never justified, that continues only as an unquestioned convention. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 22:16, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    - Your opinion only. The convention is fine by me and doubtless many others. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:38, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. Absolutely no need for the definite article. Wouldn't be capitalised in running text. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:38, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Second Great Depression is coming. Should be a whole page, not a disambiguation

There could be a second Great Depression in the 2030s. Capital misallocation is growing globally, coupled with faltering demographics. The world's growth engine is slowing down while the economic bubble keeps growing. Several economists predict a second Great Depression in the 2030s. Yes, much worse than the 2020-2023 period (or 2008). FeldmarschallGneisenau (talk) 04:35, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]