Talk:Serpula
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Serpula article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | A fact from Serpula appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 4 May 2010 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
no archives yet (create) |
Serpula
[edit]The article on Serpula lacrymans, a dry rot fungus, has a link via the genus to this page. Would it not be helpful to have a disambiguation page to distinguish between the two entirely different Serpula genera, the fungus and the tube worm? Cwmhiraeth (talk) 18:54, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
- Thank you for the comment, Cwmhiraeth. I am not sure a separate disambiguation page is really necessary, as there are only two entities to my knowledge with the name "Serpula". I have just added a disambiguation tag to the Serpula (fungi) article. I hope this will suffice. DiverDave (talk) 03:38, 26 November 2010 (UTC)