Talk:Severodvinsk

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Cities (Rated Start-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Russia / Military / Human geography (Rated C-class, High-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia.
To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
Checklist icon
 High  This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Russian, Soviet, and CIS military history task force.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the human geography of Russia task force.
 
edit·history·watch·refresh Stock post message.svg To-do list for Severodvinsk:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
  • Copyedit : article needs sub-editing to make it good, flowing English and use correct English words done but could be checked
  • Expand : more info on current economy
  • Verify : all but two facts are unreferenced, citations and references are essential
  • Wikify : lists should be converted to text or tables

Comments[edit]

File:HollyDvinsk.jpg

  • I shall work with page too Quadro86 (talk) 07:12, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

Date format[edit]

User:Ezhiki would like this article (about a Russian city) to use the US format for dates. I am well aware of the WP:DATERET guideline, where it reads: "If an article has evolved using predominantly one format, the whole article should conform to it, unless there are reasons for changing it based on strong national ties to the topic or consensus on article talk" (italics are mine). I think a very strong case can be made that this article has, by definition, "strong national ties" for using the non-US format (i.e., the one used by just about every other country on the planet). Namely, the logical day-month-year series/sequence (small-to-large). E.g., 5 February 2013. --Thorwald (talk) 23:33, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

If you carefully read the definition of "strong national ties", you will see that they only apply to English-speaking nations, not to "format varieties". Articles covering the US topics use American spelling/format, Canadian topics use Canadian spelling/format, Australian topics use Australian spelling/format, and so on. Topics with no relation to these countries, however, are free game. We have DATERET in place precisely for the purpose of preventing pointless bickering about spelling/date format choice in articles with no ties to US/UK/Canada/etc.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); February 6, 2013; 13:12 (UTC)