Talk:Shigeo Kageyama

A fact from Shigeo Kageyama appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 19 November 2022 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Shigeo Kageyama was purposely created to come across as "somewhat standoffish or nerdy"?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2022/November. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Shigeo Kageyama.

Wikipedia

Anime and manga Low‑importance

	Anime and manga portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anime and manga, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of anime, manga, and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Anime and mangaWikipedia:WikiProject Anime and mangaTemplate:WikiProject Anime and mangaanime and manga articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Fictional characters

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 21:09, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that Shigeo Kageyama was purposely created to come across as boring or nerdy? Source: Luster, Joseph (July 11, 2016). ""Mob Psycho 100" Creator ONE and Director Yuzuru Tachikawa Discuss the New Anime!". Crunchyroll. Retrieved October 22, 2022.
- ALT1: ... that Shigeo Kageyama appeared on a tweet by Eric Trump connecting the series to allegations of censorship by Google, due to Google Search results for "mob" showing Mob's face rather than a group of people? Source: https://www.animenewsnetwork.com/interest/2020-09-09/mob-psycho-100-official-accounts-comment-on-anime-trending-in-the-u.s/.163822
- ALT2: ... that Shigeo Kageyama's shy personality was based on the manga author One?

Source: https://www.cbr.com/one-manga-artist-one-punch-man-mob-psycho-100/

- Reviewed:
- Comment: Recently created.

Created by Tintor2 (talk). Self-nominated at 17:58, 23 October 2022 (UTC).[reply]

General eligibility:
New enough:
Long enough:
Other problems:

Policy compliance:

Adequate sourcing:
Neutral:
Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:
Other problems:

Hook eligibility:

Cited:
Interesting:
Other problems:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: The sentence "In the Mob Psycho 100 first original video animation Mob and his friend help Reigen write a book involving his life and accomplishments." needs to have a source citing that it's the first OVA. Otherwise, the unsourced information is all plot so that is fine. A QPQ is needed. SL93 (talk) 19:39, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@SL93: Thanks for the review. I tried referencing both of those OVAs.Tintor2 (talk) 21:34, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. Sorry for not mentioning the second OVA, but I see that it's fine now. All that is left is a QPQ. SL93 (talk) 22:23, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@SL93: Currently reviewing Atari Word Processor.Tintor2 (talk) 00:31, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is now approved. The promoter can choose the hook. SL93 (talk) 02:27, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@SL93 and Tintor2: how about

ALT0a: ... that Shigeo Kageyama was purposely created to come across as standoffish or nerdy?

which is what the source actually says. "boring" and "standoffish" aren't really the same thing. -- RoySmith (talk) 14:42, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. Use that.Tintor2 (talk) 19:13, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Restating approval. SL93 (talk) 21:49, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

theleekycauldron Just seeing if you can promote ALT0a. SL93 (talk) 16:12, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

on it :) theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/her) 20:55, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

mmmm, Tintor2, I'm not sure the article's prose clearly communicates that it was intentional, rather than a design flaw. Also, there should be a citation right after the hook fact in the article, and it appears to be a dead link. theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/her) 20:58, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

theleekycauldron I added the direct citation and a bit more to the article to make it clear. The source loads fine for me. The relevant part of the source is ":ONE: Mob’s meant to come off as somewhat standoffish or nerdy. If we made him into a supermodel, that’d force us to change a lot of the story." SL93 (talk) 21:06, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

V2-935dbd4d0e1280ca6858780877c01ead 1440w.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:37, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]