Talk:Siege of Klis

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Good article Siege of Klis has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
Date Process Result
December 15, 2012 Good article nominee Listed
Did You Know

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Siege of Klis/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Wilhelmina Will (talk · contribs) 12:37, 14 December 2012 (UTC)

  • Well written:
  • After making some grammatical corrections and minor word tweaks, the prose of the content seems in good order, and the content follows MOS guidelines. Like my singing? Ha-la-la-la-la-la-LA-LAAA!!! (talk) 16:52, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
(a) the prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct
(b) it complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation
(a) it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline
(b) all in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines
(c) it contains no original research
  • Broad in its coverage:
  • The article seems to cover all important aspects of the topic for which reliable information is available, and does not contain anything trivial. Like my singing? Ha-la-la-la-la-la-LA-LAAA!!! (talk) 16:55, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
(a) it addresses the main aspects of the topic
(b) it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style)
(a) images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content
(b) images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions

After checking the article thoroughly and making some minor improvements, I feel it is well-ready for GA status. Congratulations! Like my singing? Ha-la-la-la-la-la-LA-LAAA!!! (talk) 16:58, 15 December 2012 (UTC)

Thanks, this was fast! :) Again, thanks for help with grammar. Regards, Kebeta (talk) 17:15, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
You're welcome! :) Like my singing? Ha-la-la-la-la-la-LA-LAAA!!! (talk) 17:27, 15 December 2012 (UTC)