Talk:Sindhu Bhairavi (film)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Former good article nominee Sindhu Bhairavi (film) was a Media and drama good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There are suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
Date Process Result
December 16, 2008 Good article nominee Not listed
January 12, 2009 Peer review Reviewed
Current status: Former good article nominee

WikiProject class rating[edit]

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 19:52, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Sindhu Bhairavi/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

The article does not yet meet the Good Article criteria. The prose is quite poor, and in need of a good copyedit -- I fixed a few things, but it is clear that there are many more issues with the text. The text in the 'plot' and 'satana' sections seems to contains some rather large paragraphs, and these might be better broken up into smaller paragraphs.

The article does not seem to be complete -- where's the section on critical reviews? It's also a bit scarce on the citations, with most of the article being cited by only seven sources! Plus, the 'soundtrack' section has no sources, either.

It does pass the WP:NPOV and stability tests, and the image used is appropriately tagged. But the article is still far from complete. Dr. Cash (talk) 22:54, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

Working on the comments[edit]

I am not quite clear if this article has cleared the GA review or not. The comments above say it doesn't meet the criteria, but the talk page says its a GA article. Either may be the case I willing to further improve this article and want to know what is required for it to pass the FA review. There are few concerns I have for which help would be appreciated. Responding to the comments:
  • Button done.png Prose is basically taken from the references. I have already made a lot of corrections to it in the past and will work on it again when time permits.
I have worked on the prose but there is still room for improvement. Request others to contribute. Bharathprime (talk) 14:15, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Button done.png I will break up the large paragraphs straight away
  • Button not done.png All reviews for this film are on blogs, which is not considered a reliable source of information and moreover these reviews sound like fan articles. I would appreciate if someone could point me in the right direction here
  • Button not done.png I can't help with the count of citations. That is all the reliable data that is available on the net. We need help here from people with other sources of information like books etc..
  • Button done.png I will work on references for the soundtrack section.
Thanking Derek for the review, Bharathprime (talk) 08:03, 17 December 2008 (UTC)