Talk:Sins of the Father (Star Trek: The Next Generation)

Television: Episode coverage Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force.

Star Trek Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Star Trek, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to all Star Trek-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Star TrekWikipedia:WikiProject Star TrekTemplate:WikiProject Star TrekStar Trek articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Upconversion

The DPL bot chided me for linking to upconversion, as it's a disambiguation, but I think it was a better thing to link to than video scaler, since that deals more with televisions and computer monitors than remastering. Anyway, I just put this here so posterity won't think I'm incompetent. If anyone changes it, I won't have a tantrum. Promise. Sheavsey33 (talk) 12:27, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive addition

I had thought the purpose of Wikipedia was to provide complete, accurate information. My addition of featured music and cinematography by have been marked as 'disruptive' and removed. When the same information has been included on numerous other pages of the Star Trek; The Next Generation episodes. That being said as a long time financial contributor I am hereby ending that cycle. And have discovered that Wikipedia is NOT the reputable source I once believed. Talisnite (talk) 03:50, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Firstly, your edits were not marked as disruptive in the article history, though you were advised that they appear disruptive.[1] Secondly, as noted in the edit summary and in the notice I left on your Talk page, they were reverted because the infobox has no support for the parameters you added. If you've added these fields to other episodes, then in all likelihood they aren't displaying there either. It has nothing to do with whether the information is accurate. Adding non-existent fields to infoboxes is disruptive, however. DonIago (talk) 13:21, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]