Talk:South Denver, Colorado

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Lightburst talk 00:15, 9 October 2023 (UTC)

( Comment or view )

( Article history links:

• Rufus Clark
• South Denver, Colorado

)

Rufus Clark, Colorado's Potato King

• ... that the Potato King of Colorado (pictured) survived a shipwreck, mined for gold in Australia, and helped establish an alcohol-free Methodist colony? Source: Portrait and Biographical Record of Denver and Vicinity, Colorado: Containing Portraits and Biographies of Many Well Known Citizens of the Past and Present, Together with Biographies and Portraits of All the Presidents of the United States. Chicago: Chapman Publishing Company. 1898. p. 545–547; Van Wyke, Millie (1991). The Town of South Denver: Its People, Neighborhoods and Events Since 1858. Boulder, CO: Pruett Publishing Company. ISBN 0-87108-813-4.
  • Reviewed: India national football team at the Asian Games, September 2023 northeastern U.S. floods
  • Comment: Both QPQs to come sometime today; I may also add an image of Clark to this nomination. The Rufus Clark article is only like 70% baked and will be substantially expanded during the next 24 hours as I needed to publish it before it had been a week since the South Denver, Colorado article had been published. Let me know if you have any concerns!

Moved to mainspace by Pbritti (talk). Self-nominated at 15:03, 7 October 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Rufus Clark; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.

• General eligibility:
• New enough:
• Long enough:
• Other problems:

Policy compliance:

• Adequate sourcing:
• Neutral:
• Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:
• Other problems:

Hook eligibility:

• Cited:
• Interesting:
• Other problems:

QPQ: - Not done
Overall: Once the QPQ is completed the article should be eligible for dyk. Graearms (talk) 20:02, 7 October 2023 (UTC)

@Graearms: QPQs done; added an image. ~ Pbritti (talk) 18:00, 8 October 2023 (UTC)

Article should meet the eligibility criteria for dyk now. Graearms (talk) 18:16, 8 October 2023 (UTC)