Talk:Soyuz TMA-10

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Malaysian finalists[edit]

The four Malaysian finalists are [1]:

  • Siva Vanajah, 35 [2]
  • Mohammed Faiz Kamaluddin, 34 [3]
  • Faiz Khaleed, 26 [4]
  • Sheikh Muszaphar Shukor, 34 [5]

The selected Malaysian cosmonaut will be launched on Soyuz TMA-11 and will come back with Soyuz TMA-10.

New crew list[edit]

  • I think that the new way to present the crew adds useless complication. Hektor 14:29, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Spacefacts.de Images[edit]

Just a quick question regarding images from spacefacts.de; surely whether or not they allow the use of their images is irrelevant for us, as the images we use are originally sourced from NASA, so Spacefacts.de has absolutely no rights at all regarding what we do with the images, eg mission patches, etc.? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Colds7ream (talkcontribs) 13:18, 30 March 2007 (UTC).[reply]

  • NASA mission patches yes, but not Russian patches. You won't believe this, but Russian patches are not made by NASA !Hektor 19:14, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

So shouldn't Roskosmos have the copyright to the Russian patches, not Spacefacts.de? Colds7ream 20:39, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • I don't know what is the contractual relationship between Roskosmos and Spacefacts.de, but for wikipedia, that does not change anything : these images, not being NASA, cannot be used. Hektor 21:04, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    • Wouldn't it constitute fair use? Obviously we can't say that it is a NASA image, but in the absence of an alternative patch, I would say that it would meet Fair use criteria if properly credited. --GW_SimulationsUser Page | Talk 21:13, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
      • There you're beyond my knowledge of the rules. Hektor 21:32, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
      • My basic argument is that it is a logo being used for identification purpouses, which is allowable under fair use rules - see WP:FU. --GW_SimulationsUser Page | Talk 21:46, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
        • Pretty much my point exactly - do we have any Russian speakers who could determine exactly what the situation is for us? Colds7ream 16:34, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The owner of the patches image IS NOT the Russian Federation: It is copyrighted by Alex Panchenko a exceptional ukranian artist who lives in California. STSNews made the artwork based on his design, and sent it to SPACEFACTS. So it is clear that the "owner" of the image is not the Russian Federation. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.212.119.170 (talk) 14:50, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ratio of Expedition 15 Crewmembers[edit]

The article currently describes TMA-10 as bringing, "two-thirds of ISS Expedition 15 to the space station." This doesn't seem correct. Won't there be a total of 5 people who at some point are members of Expedition 15? Sdsds 04:05, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment on Ballistic Trajectory[edit]

The link to ballistics doesn't describe a ballistic trajectory so if you don't know how this differs from what normally happens, you have no clue what this section is talking about. Ballistics is just the study of how something moves without engines and I didn't think the engines were on when a rocket landed? Could we either clarify this article or mention what a ballistic trajectory is in the Ballistics article. As written I don't understand it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.33.111.74 (talk) 13:39, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That internal link is to an unrelated topic. 66.28.178.68 16:07, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I think it would be good to use the article called Atmospheric reentry to explain the difference between ballistic entry and lifting/guided entry. Hektor 16:30, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Soyuz TMA-10. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 11:45, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 21:15, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]