Talk:Spiritual ecology

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Spiritual ecology article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article was nominated for deletion on 16 December 2015. The result of the discussion was keep.

Ecology Low‑importance

	Ecology portal This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Ecology, an effort to create, expand, organize, and improve ecology-related articles.EcologyWikipedia:WikiProject EcologyTemplate:WikiProject EcologyEcology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Spirituality Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spirituality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spirituality-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpiritualityWikipedia:WikiProject SpiritualityTemplate:WikiProject SpiritualitySpirituality articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Environment Mid‑importance

	Environment portal This environment-related article is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized. Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.EnvironmentWikipedia:WikiProject EnvironmentTemplate:WikiProject EnvironmentEnvironment articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Philosophy Low‑importance

	Philosophy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Overlapping content

This article focuses perhaps too much on the same content as Religion and ecology. I would think that Religion and ecology should be the main article, and this would serve as a spin-off, summary style, eventually, because not all religious work on ecology/environmentalism is spiritual (as I think mentioned in this article itself). Thanks. HG | Talk 17:45, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What are the differences among the following and this topic.....???

http://scholar.google.com.hk/scholar?as_q=sacred+ecology&num=10&btnG=Search+Scholar&as_epq=&as_oq=&as_eq=&as_occt=title&as_sauthors=&as_publication=&as_ylo=&as_yhi=&as_sdt=1.&as_sdtp=on&as_sdts=5&hl=en

--58.38.41.104 (talk) 02:49, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

http://scholar.google.com.hk/scholar?hl=en&q=allintitle%3A+%22green+ecology%22&btnG=Search&as_sdt=2000&as_ylo=&as_vis=0

--58.38.41.104 (talk) 03:06, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

http://scholar.google.com.hk/scholar?as_q=holy+ecology&num=10&btnG=Search+Scholar&as_epq=&as_oq=&as_eq=&as_occt=title&as_sauthors=&as_publication=&as_ylo=&as_yhi=&as_sdt=1.&as_sdtp=on&as_sdts=5&hl=en

--58.38.41.104 (talk) 03:11, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

http://scholar.google.com.hk/scholar?hl=en&q=allintitle%3A+cult+ecology&btnG=Search&as_sdt=2000&as_ylo=&as_vis=0

--58.38.41.104 (talk) 03:12, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

http://scholar.google.com.hk/scholar?hl=en&q=allintitle%3A+cultural+ecology&btnG=Search&as_sdt=2000&as_ylo=&as_vis=0

--58.38.41.104 (talk) 03:14, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

http://scholar.google.com.hk/scholar?start=20&q=allintitle:+physiological+ecology&hl=en&newwindow=1&as_sdt=2000&as_ylo=2009

--58.38.41.104 (talk) 04:20, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Religious

Buddhism

http://scholar.google.com.hk/scholar?hl=en&q=allintitle%3A+buddhist+ecology&btnG=Search&as_sdt=2000&as_ylo=&as_vis=0

--58.38.41.104 (talk) 03:26, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Christian

http://scholar.google.com.hk/scholar?hl=en&q=allintitle%3A+christian+ecology&btnG=Search&as_sdt=2000&as_ylo=&as_vis=0

--58.38.41.104 (talk) 03:28, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Catholics

http://scholar.google.com.hk/scholar?hl=en&q=allintitle%3A+catholic+ecology&btnG=Search&as_sdt=2000&as_ylo=&as_vis=0

--58.38.41.104 (talk) 03:29, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orthodox

http://scholar.google.com.hk/scholar?as_q=orthodoxy+ecology&num=10&btnG=Search+Scholar&as_epq=&as_oq=&as_eq=&as_occt=title&as_sauthors=&as_publication=&as_ylo=&as_yhi=&as_sdt=1.&as_sdtp=on&as_sdts=5&hl=en

--58.38.41.104 (talk) 04:03, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Islam

--58.38.41.104 (talk) 03:34, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hinduism

http://scholar.google.com.hk/scholar?hl=en&q=allintitle%3A+vedic+ecology&btnG=Search&as_sdt=2000&as_ylo=&as_vis=0

--58.38.41.104 (talk) 03:32, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

http://scholar.google.com.hk/scholar?start=0&q=allintitle:+hindu+ecology&hl=en&as_sdt=2000

--124.78.213.158 (talk) 09:06, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Taoism

http://scholar.google.com.hk/scholar?hl=en&q=allintitle%3A+taoist+ecology&btnG=Search&as_sdt=2000&as_ylo=&as_vis=0

Don't know why there is little of the info found --58.38.41.104 (talk) 03:39, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Judaism

http://scholar.google.com.hk/scholar?hl=en&q=allintitle%3A+jewish+ecology&btnG=Search&as_sdt=2000&as_ylo=&as_vis=0

--58.38.41.104 (talk) 03:45, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Shinto

http://scholar.google.com.hk/scholar?as_q=shinto+ecology&num=10&btnG=Search+Scholar&as_epq=&as_oq=&as_eq=&as_occt=title&as_sauthors=&as_publication=&as_ylo=&as_yhi=&as_sdt=1.&as_sdtp=on&as_sdts=5&hl=en

--58.38.41.104 (talk) 03:48, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Confucianism

http://scholar.google.com.hk/scholar?hl=en&q=allintitle%3A+confucian+ecology&btnG=Search&as_sdt=2000&as_ylo=&as_vis=0

--124.78.213.158 (talk) 09:21, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to add more

--58.38.41.104 (talk) 03:55, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Preabrahamic polytheist AKA Pagan

76.90.226.80 (talk) 22:21, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Copy/pasted from website

This entire article is copy/pasted from http://spiritualecology.org/about-spiritual-ecology , so I flagged it as a neutrality issue. Not sure if that's the protocol but it's definitely a one sided perspective.

This article was NOT copy/pasted FROM http://spiritualecology.org/about-spiritual-ecology. The Wiki article was created first and then copy/pasted TO http://spiritualecology.org/about-spiritual-ecology.--FunkyWagon23 23:10, 15 December 2015 (UTC)FunkyWagon23 — Preceding unsigned comment added by FunkyWagon23 (talk • contribs)

In that case can you please point out the attribution sentence on the web-site acknowledging the source as required by the Wikimedia foundation. If you can conclusively demonstrate that this is indeed a copy-back and that the material is properly acknowledged on the web-site, then the copyright violation will be removed promptly Velella ^{Velella Talk} 23:19, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The attribution sentence is available, as well as the Creative Commons Attribution-Sharealike 3.0 Unported License (CC-BY-SA) and the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) to use the materials found at http://spiritualecology.org/about-spiritual-ecology -- visible at the link [1]. As per your message, please remove the copyright violation promptly. Thanks.--Gsc se (talk) 18:23, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Removing POV notice: copyright issue has been addressed. And a section of "Opposing Views" has been added to the page. Also as per POV#When_to_remove, conditions have been met: no specific explanation has been given for the neutrality issue, and the discussion has become dormant.Stormlion67 (talk) 21:11, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

OTRS

The content of this article has been derived in whole or part from http://spiritualecology.org/about-spiritual-ecology. Permission has been received from the copyright holder to release this material . Evidence of this has been confirmed and stored by VRT volunteers, under ticket number 2015121710026177.
This template is used by approved volunteers dealing with the Wikimedia volunteer response team system (VRTS) after receipt of a clear statement of permission at permissions-enwikimedia.org. Do not use this template to claim permission.

Angus Guilherme¶ 02:19, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Spiritual ecology. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Replaced archive link http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:TMxMH6IBbBIJ:www.eoearth.org/view/article/155698/+&cd=9&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us with https://web.archive.org/web/20160425003418/http://www.eoearth.org/view/article/155698/ on http://www.eoearth.org/view/article/155698/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:54, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Original research in article

This article seems to be almost entirely a personal essay and WP:OR. it seems the editors are taking the idea of Spiritual Ecology and are searching for sources that sound a bit like SE and are adding them. To not violate WP:OR, the source needs to specially mention Spiritual Ecology. Finding a source that mentions ecology and some religious sentiment is not enough. Ashmoo (talk) 13:55, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No mention of plant-based entheogens in this article? Beggars belief. Also Ecology should be capitalised in the title. --Dr zoidberg590 (talk) 19:20, 1 May 2020 (UTC)