Talk:St. Joe Company

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the St. Joe Company article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Florida Low‑importance

	Florida portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Florida. If you would like to join us, please visit the project page; if you have any questions, please consult the FAQ.FloridaWikipedia:WikiProject FloridaTemplate:WikiProject FloridaFlorida
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Neutrality disputed

I came across this article, and it reads like a hatchet job. Somebody with an axe to grind against this company has edited in all sorts of uncited, biased nonsense. Additionally, what is cited is written in a highly slanted tone. I have no particular affinity for the company, but the tone of this article is thoroughly inappropriate for an encyclopedia. I will leave this tag in place for a couple of weeks, but after that I will go through and rewrite the article to restore some semblance of neutrality. Horologium (talk) 03:54, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. It is unsurprising that the primary contributor is Mgreason, who has had problems with sourcing and neutrality before. I've removed some of the more biased wording and negative material.--Cúchullain ^t/c 16:31, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Facebook or an Encyclopedia

This article reads like a ranting Facebook post. Came here to get some information on the subject, as we are having issues with the subject. But can't use any of this as it is just hate talk. Can someone please provide factual information on this subject. Also many claims are not cited. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:4C1:C980:3DA0:84E4:E81:4B43:BADD (talk) 01:09, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]