Talk:St. Simon Stock Catholic School

Kent Low‑importance

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Kent, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the county of Kent in South East England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.KentWikipedia:WikiProject KentTemplate:WikiProject KentKent-related articles

Low

This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Kent tasks:

Here are some Kent related tasks you can do:

Clean up an article: Here are automatically generated lists of articles needing cleanup sorted alphabetically and by category.
Edit the Top and High importance articles.
Refine/polish: Ashford, Royal Tunbridge Wells, Canterbury
Expand:: List of churches in Kent, Maidstone Borough Council
NPOV: K College
Citation needed: Unreferenced Kent articles
Cleanup/Copyedit: Kingdom of Kent
Expert attention: Channel Tunnel, Bromley Civic Society
Stubs: see Kent geography stubs articles

Note: These articles may overlap with those on other related lists. If you would like to make a change, either do so yourself, or make a suggestion.

Schools Low‑importance

	Schools portal This redirect is related to WikiProject Schools, a collaborative effort to write quality articles about schools around the world. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.SchoolsWikipedia:WikiProject SchoolsTemplate:WikiProject Schoolsschool articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

I know this article needs better sources, but the trouble is, the school jsut isn't notable enuff to be noted anywhere. I really couldn't find any links other than the ones already on here. VJ Emsi 20:39, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed material from this article that does not comply with our policy on the biographies of living persons. Material in a biography must always be referenced from reliable sources, particularly negative material. Negative material that does not comply with that must be immediately removed. Note that the removal does not imply that the information is either true or false.

Please do not reinsert this material unless you can provide reliable citations, and can ensure it is written in a neutral tone. Please review the relevant policies before editing in this regard. Editors should note that failure to follow this policy may result in the removal of editing privileges. And, no, blogs or myspace pages don't count as reliable sources.--Doc^g 17:31, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Merger

Should this article not be merged with http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/St_Simon_Stock_Catholic_School ? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 81.132.185.250 (talk) 19:41, 4 January 2007 (UTC).[reply]

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 10:38, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Stsimonstockschoolcrest.jpg

Image:Stsimonstockschoolcrest.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 06:28, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Contact Information

This article isn't written in a neutral manner, or at least thats my opinion, and I don't feel that having a section on the schools adress/number etc... helps that. I feel this section was removed but I just though I'd point it out here first. Also I have removed Red linked Image and changed motto accordingly (It didn't look good in italics under nothing.) And Have changed the "notable pupils" section above the external links as a matter of good practice. Any opionions I now have this page on my watch list. mczack26 speaktome 15:32, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Also There is a new Info box for Uk schools. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mczack26 (talk • contribs) 15:34, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've Updated the info box mczack26 speaktome 16:00, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have Generally improved the article though both pages are in my watchlist, higher res image is needed. mczack26 speaktome 16:15, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]