Talk:Stafford railway station

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject Stations.
	This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as Low-importance).

Text and/or other creative content from Stafford Parkway railway station was copied or moved into Stafford railway station with this edit on 10:44, 21 February 2014. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[West Coast Main Line#Stafford-Crewe|trunk of the line]] The anchor (#Stafford-Crewe) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Should include the station address including postcode which is ST16 2AA.

Trent Valley

The link for Trent Valley takes us to a named section in the West Coast Main Line (WCML) atricle that does not appear to exist now. Should the link now point at the atricle Trent Valley Line or should the WCML article be modified to include the appropriate section again?

Keith D 12:15, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It is clear that the Stafford Station article is in need of rewriting.

I was not aware until today that a four line stub article had been written for the Trent Valley Line. The Trent Valley line is a section of the West Coast Main Line (and has been for over 150 years) with almost all the trough traffic between Rugby and Stafford and by common consent the line through Birmingham with little through traffic is the heavily used West Midlands branch. I do not see any need for a Trent Valley article. That part of the through route is in any case far far better covered in the West Coast Main Line article. Next thing we shall find ourselves with separate articles for the London to Bletchley line and the Bletchley to Rugby branch or the Stafford to Crewe branch or the Crewe to Preston branch or the Preston to Carlisle line or even the Carlisle to Carstairs Junction branch. NoelWalley 12:54, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I was just picking up on one of the orphaned articles to add some links to it. If the stub need to be merged into the WCML article then that may be what should happen. It appears though that the WCML article is being split out into separate articles e.g. Rugby-Birmingham-Stafford Line which came from there.

Keith D 13:22, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Merge proposal

I propose merging Stafford Parkway railway station into this article. Stafford Parkway is a one line stub about a proposed new station that was mentioned in the local paper in 2008 and apart from a very inconclusive meeting beetween Stafford Council and DFT in 2008 has never been heard of again, or at least not in any sources I have been able to find. Nthep (talk) 15:34, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Go ahead. Simply south...... disorganising disorganisation for just 7 years 20:15, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure it should be merged into Stafford railway station, though I agree that as an article it is useless. Perhaps rail transport in Staffordshire or something. -mattbuck (Talk) 11:10, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps a mention in both, but Rail transport in Staffordshire requires more than a little attention too. Nthep (talk) 12:27, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Have merged to this article. Nthep (talk) 10:57, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]