Talk:Stanley McCandless

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Stagecraft (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Stagecraft, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.StagecraftWikipedia:WikiProject StagecraftTemplate:WikiProject StagecraftStagecraft articles

Biography Stub‑class

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
Stub	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 04:33, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merging with McCandless Method

It seems like inserting the article on his method would be reasonable. DJSparky (talk) 04:41, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As I commented there as well, I agree. The "method" article is a stub and would fit well here, with that article becoming a redirect. Ed Fitzgerald (unfutz) ^{(talk / cont)} 21:53, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I see no problem, especially if the redirect pointed to the section on the method. -JWGreen (talk) 23:42, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Prcisely! Ed Fitzgerald (unfutz) ^{(talk / cont)} 02:32, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've done the merge. The old page points to the MM section here. Ed Fitzgerald (unfutz) ^{(talk / cont)} 04:54, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Stanley McCandless. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927191648/http://www.northern.edu/wild/LiteDes/ldhist.htm to http://www.northern.edu/wild/LiteDes/ldhist.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:12, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]