	Comics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by DC Comics work group.

LGBTQ+ studies

This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies articles

Fictional characters

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

Openly gay?

I don't think that Starman III can be described as "openly gay". He addressed that issue in the 1990 Starman series; his choice of partners his natural for his species. Drawing conclusions towards his choice would be the same as drawing like conclusions about dolphins.

Well, he isn't described as "openly gay", just "openly in a gay relationship", which is perfectly true. J•A•K 22:12, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Of course, many Humans in openly gay relationships say that their choice of partners is perfectly natural for them, too. However, it seems reasonable to accept "sexual relationship between two humans of the same gender" as the definition of "gay relationship." Mikaal Tomas belongs to a species with a different reproductive pattern and so the concept "gay" does not apply to him (so, if he had a girlfriend, as he was portrayed as doing sometimes, he would not be described as "openly in a heterosexual relationship"). Nonetheless, it appears that, whatever gender Mikaal is, he resembles a human male aesthetically and physiologically to a sufficient degree that he can attract gay human males and engage in a relationship with them, and that he and they can derive quite a bit of pleasure from this whole business. Mikaal may not be gay, but Tony, as far as I ever understood, IS. Perhaps "openly in a relationship with a gay human male" would be most clear.

Josephth314 (talk) 19:53, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It has since been clarified in Starman/Congorilla #1 that Mikaal identifies himself as gay, so gay it is. It's possible his species has a fluid sexuality or something like that, which would account for his earlier interest in women. ForrestMoss (talk) 07:40, 12 December, 2014 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:New starman.jpg

Image:New starman.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 21:43, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Starmen.jpg

Image:Starmen.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 15:43, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That guy look like Captain Universe

Old West Starman's last name

The article states that no last name has been revealed but in the very issue the article discusses Johna Hex introduces him as "Victor Sono, AKA Star Man". Page 21 of the comic Jonah Hex volume 2 issue 27. I'm fixing it but have no idea how to properly add a citation to an issue of a comic book. --Redwulf25 ci (talk) 21:19, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Chronology of name usage

It says early on that all users of the moniker are being listed chronologically, but then Jonah's guy is listed after Farris Knight of the 853rd Century. Victor Sono really ought to be put ahead Theodore Henry Knight (a certain silver-haired actor prevents me from calling the "mystery man" Ted). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.40.136.79 (talk) 20:15, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Chronology here is based on when the stories were published, not when they are set. - J Greb (talk) 00:29, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Is a citation really needed?

There's a "citation needed" tag in the section on Starman of 1951. It says right in the text that the story was published in Detective Comics #247 (September 1957). Is an additional citation really needed? WaxTadpole (talk) 14:10, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Starman (comics). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:01, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]