Talk:Stupid!

BBC: Sitcoms Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject BBC, an attempt to better organise information in articles related to the BBC. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join us as a member. You can also visit the BBC Portal.BBCWikipedia:WikiProject BBCTemplate:WikiProject BBCBBC articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by BBC Sitcoms Task Force.

Tasks for WikiProject BBC:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Improve BBC, BBC News (TV channel) and BBC News to Good Article status following previous reviews, create BBC Computer Literacy Project (in light of forthcoming 30th anniversary)
Cleanup : Chucklevision - references and general clean-up, Pebble Mill Studios - over-detailed and long, BBC World Service Television - unreferenced and confusing
Copyedit : BBC News, Broadcasting House
Expand : Top 20 start-class BBC articles with most importance: BBC Japan, BBC World Service Television, BBC Lifestyle, BBC Two Northern Ireland
NPOV : Criticism of the BBC (See comments)
Stubs : Stub-Class BBC articles
Other : *Restructure the category
- Add infoboxes to the BBC articles without infoboxes
- Add free-use images to biographical articles where possible
- Add references to Goa Mix (see assessment) and Coat of arms of the BBC
- Return Dad's Army to a Good article. (See comments)
- Reassess BBC following improvements to article.

Television: British

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the British television task force.

It is requested that an image or photograph of Stupid! be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Page Edit

I have edited the page to revert spamming done by 91.84.230.13 ~Wack0

List of Characters ?

Maybe we should add a list of characters that are normally in the show like on the page for Goodness Gracious Me I've started the list, by adding a characters.--TheDalek 14:33, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Barber Shop Bananas?

Aren't the barber shop bananas in Stitch Up! rather that Stupid? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.137.52.112 (talk • contribs) 07:24, November 12, 2006

Diamond in the Rough

I like how much effort has gone into this article, props to the people who put it together. However, I think it requires a fair bit of work. In some cases, there is too much information on trivial matters, and in other (somewhat amusing) instances there are some random non sequiturs, like the bit that started talking about Greenland's political status. Somewhat off-topic for a kid's show, I think. I have tidied up a lot of the unnecessary stuff but the character list needs some toning down as it is far too long and detailed. I always think it's important to note what is important about the show, not everything you can remember - it's really off-putting to readers who are not fans of the show. Plus, everything needs to be cited, which is something that needs to be worked on.

If anyone's reading this, then chances are you contributed to the article so thank you, as it reflects a decent amount of effort and work. It just needs some tweaking to make it a better class article. I'll be working on some more tidying soon, then developing it from there. Sometimes you have to destroy in order to rebuild. Ray and jub (talk) 16:01, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]