No info on production?

I'm surprised there's no info in this article on the production of the song or even where it was recorded. This is a standard in any Wikipedia article for an all-time classic. -Rolypolyman (talk) 03:08, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Alternate Versions?

Untitled

Besides the acoustic version, I believe there are two different versions of this song. My brother played me a version that is different from the one I hear on the radio. Their voices are not as strong and the instruments are more in focus. Did they record different versions? Has this song appeared on any albums other than Songs For Jane?KannD86 (talk) 22:32, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I remember I used to have a different mix of "Songs About Jane" that definitely had an alternate version of Sunday Morning, but I don't have a source for this...sorry173.48.62.136 (talk) 03:54, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I know for sure that there are two versions since I've heard both. One is the CD version where the song has more of a jazz feeling and the piano takes a more important role than just harmonic support in the Music Video version. Also there were brass instruments(I think trumpet, saxophone and more). It wouldn't be hard for one who has heard both to find out that the radio(music video) version is made after the CD version, the vocals are asKannD said a less "strong" vocal. I don't know why there are two versions and there aren't any sources to justify the existence of another version.Yutongl (talk) 02:48, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I believe the alternate version you are referencing is the "demo" version. It has a more jazz feel and includes a saxaphone. Also the intro does not include a strong drum beat but instead starts with a solo piano. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=snNhFQEFzKM

Offensive Element?

Everyone seems to overlook an offensive element to video for Sunday Morning. The karaoke machine that all the people are sing songs to has the image of half naked child in the background singing along the words of the song. Perhaps the directory were trying to was trying to create the image of innocent little moppet. But, the imagery, instead, is very disturbing and I'm very surprised no one has made any notice of this.

There's nothing offensive about it. You barely see any more than the kid's face and shoulders, and you don't even know if the kid is a boy or a girl. By the way, you need to start signing your posts here, because as it is, I'm wondering if you're serious or just a troll. Mellophonius (talk) 04:28, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Maroon5SundayMorning.jpg

Image:Maroon5SundayMorning.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:55, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Song Didn't Peak at #14

Hasn't anyone noticed the inaccurate information in the opening paragraph? This song peaked at #31. Shouldn't it be changed? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.10.92.186 (talk) 10:57, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Sunday Morning (Maroon 5 song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121219094524/http://www.gaonchart.co.kr/main/section/online/download/list.gaon to http://gaonchart.co.kr/main/section/online/download/list.gaon

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:35, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Jazz Fusion

How is it jazz fusion? Dark Lord Thomas Pie (talk) 15:25, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]