Jump to content

Talk:Sunder Nagar

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Nom for deletion

[edit]

This page has been nominated for deletion. Please see it's discussion page at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sunder Nagar and contribute to discussion. PeteShanosky 00:25, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

cut paste from the article.

[edit]

I have cut out this part from the article. does it really worth to be there? Ganesh Dhamodkar (Talk) 06:57, 2 February 2009 (UTC) Sunder Nagar From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to: navigation, search[reply]

 ?Sunder Nagar

Mumbai • Maharashtra • India Map of Mumbai indicating the location of Sunder Nagar Thumbnail map of India with Maharashtra highlighted Location of Sunder Nagar in India Location of Sunder Nagar

Sunder Nagar 

Coordinates: [show location on an interactive map] 19°10′36″N 72°50′38″E / 19.1766, 72.844 Time zone IST (UTC+5:30) Area • Elevation • 13 m (43 ft) District(s) Mumbai suburban district Parliamentary constituency Mumbai North Assembly constituency 43 Civic agency MCGM Zone 5 Ward P/North Codes • Pincode • 400 064

Coordinates: [show location on an interactive map] 19°10′36″N 72°50′38″E / 19.1766, 72.844

The Marwari influence in Sunder Nagar is very high.

Sunder Nagar is also popular for its unity and social works. All units and buildings come together and celebrate every festival with full delite and devotion. Streets are enlightened during Ganesh Chaturthi, Navratri,Janmashtami, etc. A temple of Vaishnodevi Mata is situated at the heart of Sunder Nagar.

Sunder Nagar Garden is quite famous for its Cricket and Football facilities. The garden includes a huge playground having all facilities, joggers area, water tank known as 'Pyau'.At evenings it is a place to be!!One can enjoy the Golawala',Pani-Puri, Shankar's sandwich and Dosas.

In all Sunder Nagar is a place where one can live a happy and friendly life!!

Coordinate error

[edit]

{{geodata-check}}

The following coordinate fixes are needed for


45.116.232.45 (talk) 10:32, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You haven't said what you think is wrong with the coordinates in the article, and they appear to be basically correct (though I've tweaked them slightly). If you think that the coordinates are erroneous, you'll need to give a clear explanation of the problem. Deor (talk) 02:40, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]