This article was previously nominated for deletion. The result of the discussion was keep.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago articles
As an unreistered user, I can't create the new page needed for AFD. If you are not hypocritical in your obsession with verifiability, you will do this for me. 129.59.135.5223:28, 21 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not make false accusations of vandalism (you called your edit of my removal of unsourced material "rvv"...as the wikipedia verifibility policy states, any editor may remove unsourced materia; Well, I removed unsourced material. How was that vandalism. Thanks. 129.59.135.5217:51, 22 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The assertion that she is a "leading expert" and has "contributed" to her field currently lacks sufficient references. the only reference given is her own faculty bio -- profs typically write their own bios, so this is hardly a reliable source. Moreover, given this good-faith rationale for removing this unsupported information (and every wikipedian's right to remove unsourced material), EVula's describing this as vandalism appears to be a personal attack. 129.59.135.5218:53, 22 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
