Talk:Take the Crown
Appearance
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Requested move 10 December 2017
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: move. Consensus to move based on strength of arguments. (non-admin closure) feminist (talk) 15:15, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
Take the Crown (album) → Take the Crown – The album is clearly more notable than the band. None of their albums even have articles.[1] Unreal7 (talk) 17:04, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
- Not particularly opposed to the move, but the target is (was) still a redirect to the band before it was moved July. which means that https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:WhatLinksHere/Take_the_Crown misslinks need cleaning up. I've converted the redirect to a short dab to allow dabbot to pick up links and fix the problem, no objection if that dab is moved out to Take the Crown (disambiguation) in 7 days if the RM passes. In ictu oculi (talk) 20:41, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose The album gets fewer than 100 page views a day. While the band gets 4, there's no primary topic. Walter Görlitz (talk) 06:23, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
- Support. 83.9% of the page views and a wide majority of Google News sources is a clear indication of a primary topic.--Cúchullain t/c 16:57, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.