Talk:Tasha's Cauldron of Everything

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Tasha's Cauldron of Everything article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Dungeons & Dragons Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of the Dungeons & Dragons WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Dungeons & Dragons-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, or join the discussion, where you can join the project and find out how to help!Dungeons & DragonsWikipedia:WikiProject Dungeons & DragonsTemplate:WikiProject Dungeons & DragonsDungeons & Dragons articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

D&D to-do:

view

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Merge : Various articles
Stubs : Dungeoneer's Survival Guide, Swords & Spells, Variant Dungeons & Dragons games, More...
Update : Rewrite to be out-of-universe: Companions of the Hall, Dark Sun, Elf (Dungeons & Dragons)
Verify : add sources to novels planned for merge to List of Dragonlance novels
Other : Collaboration: Dave Arneson, Drow (Dungeons & Dragons)

Role-playing games Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Role-playing games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of role-playing games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Role-playing gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Role-playing gamesTemplate:WikiProject Role-playing gamesrole-playing game articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Over-quotation, and "Reception" section[edit]

The "Reception" section of the article is currently made up almost entirely of long, mostly unnecessary quotations (with more long and mostly unnecessary quotations earlier in the page as well). However, the arguably more significant issue with the section as it currently stands is that none of the current section describes the reception of the book itself (which is, of course, impossible to provide, since the book's not out yet); it's all just "reception" of the announcement of the book (and what has been announced about what it will contain). Calling this a "Reception" section is somewhat misleading. See point #5 under WP:FUTURE:

Wikipedia is not a collection of product announcements and rumors. Although Wikipedia includes up-to-date knowledge about newly revealed products, short articles that consist of only product announcement information are not appropriate. Until such time that more encyclopedic knowledge about the product can be verified, product announcements should be merged to a larger topic (such as an article about the creator(s), a series of products, or a previous product) if applicable.

There may be something relevant to discuss as the book gets closer to release, but as it currently stands, the entire article is essentially just a rehashing of "only product announcement information". Most of the actual product information seems encyclopedic and well-sourced, but very little of the "Publication history" as it currently stands actually provides new information on the book's "publication history", and none of the "Reception" section tells us about the book's reception (only the reception of its announcement). Frankly, the latter section is probably entirely unnecessary at this point, as there's not going to be any meaningful information about the reception of the book itself until the book is in people's hands. V2Blast (talk) 05:52, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]